Smart fertigation effects on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield, nutrient uptake and soil health

被引:0
作者
Aathithyan, C. [1 ]
Gurusamy, A. [1 ]
Subramanian, E. [2 ]
Hemalatha, G. [3 ]
Kumutha, K. [4 ]
Saliha, B. A. Bhakiyathu [5 ]
Kamalesh, S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Agr Coll & Res Inst AC&RI, Dept Agron, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Indian Council Agr Res ICAR Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Community Sci Coll & Res Inst CSC&RI, Dept Food Policy & Publ Hlth Nutr, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Agr Coll & Res Inst AC&RI, Dept Agr Microbiol, Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu, India
[5] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Agr Res Stn, Kovilpatti 628501, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Velammal Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Informat Technol, Madurai 625009, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
PLANT SCIENCE TODAY | 2025年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
enzyme activities; groundnut; microbial population; nutrient uptake; sensors; smart fertigation; yield; WATER PRODUCTIVITY; DRIP IRRIGATION; USE EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.14719/pst.7007
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Precise application of water and nutrients is crucial for sustainable groundnut cultivation. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of smart fertigation systems on groundnut yield, nutrient uptake, soil microbial population and soil enzyme activities. The experiments were conducted at two locations. Location I was at a farmer's field in Kanjipatti village, Kalaiyarkoil block, Sivagangai district, Tamil Nadu (rabi 2023) and Location II was at the Central Farm of the Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai district, Tamil Nadu (summer2024). Field trials were laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised three drip irrigation methods in the main plots, namely; conventional drip irrigation (M1), time-based automated drip irrigation (M2) and sensor-based automated drip irrigation (M3) and five drip fertigation methods in the subplots, viz., drip fertigation of 75% RDF (F1), drip fertigation of 100% RDF (F2), STCR-based drip fertigation (F3), sensor-based fertigation at 75% NPK level (F4) and sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (F5). The results revealed that pod yield, total NPK uptake, pod uptake, haulm uptake, microbial population and enzyme activities were significantly higher with the combination of sensor-based automated drip irrigation and sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (M3F5). The M3F5 treatment increased crop yield by 44-45%, dehydrogenase activity by 44-64% and phosphatase activity by 57-65% across both seasons compared to M1F1. However, the post-harvest available nutrient status was recorded higher with conventional drip irrigation combined with drip fertigation of 100% RDF (M1F2). Based on the experimental results, it can be concluded that sensor-based automated drip irrigation combined with sensor-based fertigation at 100% NPK level (M3F5) enhanced groundnut yield, nutrient uptake, microbial population and enzyme activities.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genotypic differences for reproductive growth, yield, and yield components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Caliskan, Sevgi
    Caliskan, Mehmet Emin
    Arslan, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2008, 32 (05) : 415 - 424
  • [22] Effect of irrigation and fertilizer on yield, water-use efficiency and nutrient uptake of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)
    Kumar, V
    Ghosh, BC
    Bhat, R
    Karmakar, S
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2000, 45 (04) : 756 - 760
  • [23] Influence of intercrops and sulphur on nutrient uptake and food quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)
    Dayanand
    Meena, NL
    Shivran, AC
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2002, 72 (10): : 594 - 596
  • [24] Early generation testing for yield and physiological components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    B.R. Ntare
    Euphytica, 1999, 107 : 141 - 147
  • [25] Early generation testing for yield and physiological components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Ntare, BR
    EUPHYTICA, 1999, 107 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [26] Genetic analysis of pod yield and its components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Jivani, L. L.
    Khanpara, M. D.
    Vachhani, J. H.
    Kachhadia, V. H.
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2009, 10 (01) : 116 - 118
  • [27] FORAGE POTENTIAL OF SOME GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) CULTIVARS
    Ozyigit, Yasar
    Bilgen, Mehmet
    ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2013, 30 : 57 - 63
  • [28] Phosphate solubilizing bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, improve the growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Das Mohapatra, Monalisha
    Sahoo, Ranjan Kumar
    Tuteja, Narendra
    PHYSIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PLANTS, 2024, 30 (07) : 1099 - 1111
  • [29] Weed Management in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with in Southern Rajasthan
    Jat, Harikesh
    Kaushik, M. K.
    Choudhary, J. L.
    Meena, V. K.
    Meena, S. K.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2023, 46 (04) : 513 - 518
  • [30] Genetic variability and correlation studies for morphological, yield and yield attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Vasanthi, R. P.
    Suneetha, N.
    Sudhakar, P.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2015, 38 (01) : 9 - 15