Same Classroom, Different Reality: Secondary School Students' Perceptions of STEM Lessons-A Pioneering Study

被引:1
作者
Ketscher, Lukas [1 ]
Stoeger, Heidrun [2 ]
Vialle, Wilma [3 ]
Ziegler, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Fac Humanities Social Sci & Theol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Fac Human Sci, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[3] Univ Wollongong, Sch Educ, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
关键词
situational cues; situation perception; gender; STEM education; DIAMONDS; SITUATIONAL; 8; DIAMONDS; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; TAXONOMY;
D O I
10.3390/educsci15040467
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Our study is the first exploration of students' situational perceptions of STEM lessons based on the DIAMONDS approach. This approach postulates eight perceptual dimensions: Duty, Intellect, Adversity, Mating, pOsitivity, Negativity, Deception, and Sociality. Three research questions were investigated in a validation study involving 447 eighth graders, each based on a distinct validation strategy. (1) Convergent validation strategy: How do students perceive STEM lessons regarding the DIAMONDS dimensions? (2) Criterion-related validation strategy: Are these perceptions associated with STEM education outcomes? (3) Explanatory validation strategy: Do gender differences also appear in the perception of STEM lessons? Data were collected via an online questionnaire. The main results indicated that (1) students associate STEM lessons mainly with Duty and Intellect; (2) their situational perception of STEM lessons was linked to STEM education outcomes; and (3) there were substantial variances in how students perceive STEM lessons. Male students perceived STEM lessons more positively (pOsitivity), while females associated them relatively more with negative attributes (Adversity, Negativity, or Deception). All three validation strategies produced results confirming the validity of the DIAMONDS approach. In this way, the results of our study offer a promising start for the DIAMONDS approach in STEM education research.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[31]   Distinguishing Four Types of Person x Situation Interactions: An Integrative Framework and Empirical Examination [J].
Kuper, Niclas ;
von Garrel, Alina S. ;
Wiernik, Brenton M. ;
Phan, Le Vy ;
Modersitzki, Nick ;
Rauthmann, John F. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 126 (02) :282-311
[32]   Individual Differences in Contingencies Between Situation Characteristics and Personality States [J].
Kuper, Niclas ;
Breil, Simon M. ;
Horstmann, Kai T. ;
Roemer, Lena ;
Lischetzke, Tanja ;
Sherman, Ryne A. ;
Back, Mitja D. ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Rauthmann, John F. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 123 (05) :1166-1198
[33]   How Do Men and Women Perceive a High-Stakes Test Situation? [J].
Leiner, Julia E. M. ;
Scherndl, Thomas ;
Ortner, Tuulia M. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
[34]   How Behavioral and Psychological Factors Influence STEM Performance in K-12 Schools: A Mediation Model [J].
Lu, Chun ;
Yang, Wei ;
Wu, Longkai ;
Yang, Xiao .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 32 (03) :379-389
[35]   Structural relationships between classroom emotional climate, teacher-student interpersonal relationships and students' attitudes to STEM [J].
McLure, Felicity, I ;
Fraser, Barry J. ;
Koul, Rekha B. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2022, 25 (2-3) :625-648
[36]   The Development of Children's Gender Stereotypes About STEM and Verbal Abilities: A Preregistered Meta-Analytic Review of 98 Studies [J].
Miller, David I. ;
Lauer, Jillian E. ;
Tanenbaum, Courtney ;
Burr, Lauren .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2024, 150 (12) :1363-1396
[37]   Does My Professor Think My Ability Can Change? Students' Perceptions of Their STEM Professors' Mindset Beliefs Predict Their Psychological Vulnerability, Engagement, and Performance in Class [J].
Muenks, Katherine ;
Canning, Elizabeth A. ;
LaCosse, Jennifer ;
Green, Dorainne J. ;
Zirkel, Sabrina ;
Garcia, Julie A. ;
Murphy, Mary C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2020, 149 (11) :2119-2144
[38]  
Mullet DR, 2017, J ADV ACAD, V28, P253, DOI 10.1177/1932202X17735305
[39]  
O'Keeffe P., 2013, College Student Journal, V47, P605, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJME.2014.01.003
[40]  
OECD, 2024, New tertiary graduates in science, technology, engineering and mathematics as a share of new graduates