Digital transformation of government: sustainability through e-governance

被引:0
作者
Wang, Chuhao [1 ]
Khalid, Khan [2 ]
Zhang, Haiyuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Taishan Univ, Coll Digital Econ, Tai An, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Hengxing Univ Sci & Technol, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Univ, Sch Econ, Nanning, Peoples R China
关键词
Digitalization; e-governance; Europe; Granger causality; Sustainable Development Goals; INNOVATION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1080/09540962.2025.2484795
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Countries adopting e-governance (EGV) are shown in this article to have improved public service delivery by making government services more accessible and transparent. These countries have addressed the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) goals around infrastructure, innovation, and decreased disparities by implementing online options for many of their services, hence enhancing accessibility and efficiency. Meanwhile, in pursuit of the SDGs, these countries have established strong institutions and governance frameworks, resulting in consistent advancements in EGV and an enabling environment for digital operations. This study investigates the relationship between e-governance (EGV) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). EGV significantly influenced the SDGs in half of the case study countries, suggesting that improved digital governance frameworks facilitate the effective implementation of sustainability initiatives and support the achievement of SDG targets. On the other hand, the results also indicated that the SDGs have a causal impact on EGV in half of the countries, which implies that a commitment to the SDGs can drive enhancements in governance structures and practices. This article provides an analysis of the relationship between the SDGs and EGV, evaluating whether EGV can facilitate the achievement of the SDGs and vice versa.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aljarallah S., 2020, Electronic Journal of e-Government, V18, P1, DOI [10.34190/EJEG.18.1.001, DOI 10.34190/EJEG.18.1.001]
[2]   Does local government staff perceive digital communication with citizens as improved service? [J].
Berger, Jesper B. ;
Hertzum, Morten ;
Schreiber, Trine .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2016, 33 (02) :258-269
[4]   Digital Government and Sustainable Development [J].
Castro, Conceicao ;
Lopes, Cristina .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2022, 13 (02) :880-903
[5]  
Cecchini S., 2003, Information Technology for Development, V10, P73, DOI 10.1002/itdj.1590100203
[6]  
Choi Y., 2017, Digital business and sustainable development: Asian perspectives, P1, DOI [10.4324/9781315200590, DOI 10.4324/9781315200590]
[7]   Disrupting the Welfare State? Digitalisation and the Retrenchment of Public Sector Capacity [J].
Collington, Rosie .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, 27 (02) :312-328
[8]  
Dhaoui I., 2020, E-government for sustainable development in MENA countries
[9]   E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries [J].
Dhaoui, Iyad .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2022, 13 (03) :2070-2099
[10]   Transforming industry: Investigating 4.0 technologies for sustainable product evolution in china through a novel fuzzy three-way decision-making process [J].
Duan, Wenqi ;
Khurshid, Adnan ;
Khan, Khalid ;
Calin, Adrian Cantemir .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 200