Federated and Centralized Machine Learning for Cell Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis

被引:0
作者
Bruschi, Sara [1 ]
Esposito, Marco [1 ]
Raggiunto, Sara [2 ]
Belli, Alberto [1 ]
Pierleoni, Paola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Informat Engn DII, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
[2] Univ Politecn Marche, Natl Interuniv Consortium Telecommun CNIT, Res Unit, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
来源
ELECTRONICS | 2025年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
biological imaging; cell segmentation; data privacy; deep learning; federated learning; semantic segmentation;
D O I
10.3390/electronics14071254
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The automatic segmentation of cell images plays a critical role in medicine and biology, as it enables faster and more accurate analysis and diagnosis. Traditional machine learning faces challenges since it requires transferring sensitive data from laboratories to the cloud, with possible risks and limitations due to patients' privacy, data-sharing regulations, or laboratory privacy guidelines. Federated learning addresses data-sharing issues by introducing a decentralized approach that removes the need for laboratories' data sharing. The learning task is divided among the participating clients, with each training a global model situated on the cloud with its local dataset. This guarantees privacy by only transmitting updated model weights to the cloud. In this study, the centralized learning approach for cell segmentation is compared with the federated one, demonstrating that they achieve similar performances. Stemming from a benchmarking of available cell segmentation models, Cellpose, having shown better recall and precision (F1=0.84) than U-Net (F1=0.50) and StarDist (F1=0.12), was used as the baseline for a federated learning testbench implementation. The results show that both binary segmentation and multi-class segmentation metrics remain high when employing both the centralized solution (F1=0.86) and the federated solution (F12clients=0.86). These results were also stable across an increasing number of clients and a reduced number of local data samples (F14clients=0.87, F116clients=0.86), proving the effectiveness of central aggregation on the cloud of locally trained models.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] A Survey on Federated Learning: The Journey From Centralized to Distributed On-Site Learning and Beyond
    AbdulRahman, Sawsan
    Tout, Hanine
    Ould-Slimane, Hakima
    Mourad, Azzam
    Talhi, Chamseddine
    Guizani, Mohsen
    [J]. IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2021, 8 (07): : 5476 - 5497
  • [2] Ajao A., 2024, P 2024 INT C SCI ENG, P1
  • [3] The Data Heterogeneity Issue Regarding COVID-19 Lung Imaging in Federated Learning: An Experimental Study
    Alhafiz, Fatimah
    Basuhail, Abdullah
    [J]. BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2025, 9 (01)
  • [4] Beutel D.J., 2022, Open-Source, Mobile-Friendly Federated Learning Framework
  • [5] CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes
    Carpenter, Anne E.
    Jones, Thouis Ray
    Lamprecht, Michael R.
    Clarke, Colin
    Kang, In Han
    Friman, Ola
    Guertin, David A.
    Chang, Joo Han
    Lindquist, Robert A.
    Moffat, Jason
    Golland, Polina
    Sabatini, David M.
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2006, 7 (10)
  • [6] Improved Segmentation of Cellular Nuclei Using UNET Architectures for Enhanced Pathology Imaging
    Castro, Simao
    Pereira, Vitor
    Silva, Rui
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (16)
  • [7] cellpose, Models, Cellpose
  • [8] Cellpose, ABOUT US
  • [9] FogBank: a single cell segmentation across multiple cell lines and image modalities
    Chalfoun, Joe
    Majurski, Michael
    Dima, Alden
    Stuelten, Christina
    Peskin, Adele
    Brady, Mary
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 15
  • [10] Chen HR, 2023, MOL BIOL CELL, V34, DOI 10.1091/mbc.E22-08-0364