Can government procurement drive corporate green technology innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies

被引:1
作者
Tang, Liang [1 ]
Zhao, Hengkai [1 ]
Zhou, Zhuofan [1 ]
Qian, Zixi [1 ]
Hou, Shanshan [2 ]
Liu, Bo [3 ]
机构
[1] Fuyang Normal Univ, Sch Business, Qinghe Rd, Fuyang, Peoples R China
[2] Fuyang Normal Univ, Sch Marxism, Qinghe Rd, Fuyang, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Normal Univ, Ginling Coll, Ninghai Rd, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Government procurement; Green technology innovation; Financing constraints; Internal control; ESG disclosure; Executive myopia; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102592
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Examining the impact of public procurement mechanism government procurement systems on corporate green technology innovation from a demand-side perspective has become a critical issue for encouraging green innovation in enterprises. Using empirical data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2023, this study employs a dual fixed-effect model to test the effects of government purchase behavior on green technology innovation. The findings indicate that government procurement significantly promotes green technology innovation in enterprises. Mechanism analysis reveals that public procurement activity fosters green technology innovation by easing financing constraints, strengthening market competitiveness, improving ESG quality and goodwill image. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that the incentive effect of this system is particularly pronounced among enterprises with weak internal controls, state-owned enterprises, and lowgrowth enterprises. Further research indicates that executive myopia diminishes the innovation-driven impact of government procurement. This study contributes a novel perspective on how government procurement can enhance enterprises' green technology innovation. Additionally, the findings reveal that executive myopia serves as a negative moderating factor in this process.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   The effect of financial constraints on innovation in developing countries Evidence from 11 African countries [J].
Ayalew, Misraku Molla ;
Zhang, Xianzhi .
ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2020, 28 (03) :273-308
[2]   Analyst Earning Forecasts and Advertising and R&D Budgets: Role of Agency Theoretic Monitoring and Bonding Costs [J].
Chakravarty, Anindita ;
Grewal, Rajdeep .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2016, 53 (04) :580-596
[3]   Sustainability Orientation, Green Supplier Involvement, and Green Innovation Performance: Evidence from Diversifying Green Entrants [J].
Cheng, Colin C. J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 161 (02) :393-414
[4]  
Cui H. Y., 2023, China Industrial Economy, P118, DOI DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2023.10.004
[5]   Interorganizational learning, green knowledge integration capability and green innovation [J].
Cui, Rixiao ;
Wang, Juanru ;
Xue, Yajiong ;
Liang, Huigang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (04) :1292-1314
[6]   Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms [J].
Czarnitzki, Dirk ;
Hanel, Petr ;
Rosa, Julio Miguel .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (02) :217-229
[7]   Direct demand-pull and indirect certification effects of public procurement for innovation [J].
Dai, Xiaoyong ;
Li, Yanchao ;
Chen, Kaihua .
TECHNOVATION, 2021, 101
[8]  
[窦超 Dou Chao], 2020, [科研管理, Science Research Management], V41, P197
[9]   Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation [J].
Edler, Jakob ;
Yeow, Jillian .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) :414-426
[10]  
Fan Q. Q., 2023, Public Finance Research, P83