Rings of Hilbert modular forms, computations on Hilbert modular surfaces, and the Oda–Hamahata conjecture
被引:0
作者:
Adam Logan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Carleton University,School of Mathematics and Statistics, 4302 Herzberg Laboratories, 1125 Colonel By DriveCarleton University,School of Mathematics and Statistics, 4302 Herzberg Laboratories, 1125 Colonel By Drive
Adam Logan
[1
]
机构:
[1] Carleton University,School of Mathematics and Statistics, 4302 Herzberg Laboratories, 1125 Colonel By Drive
The modularity of an elliptic curve E/Q\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$E/{\mathbb Q}$$\end{document} can be expressed either as an analytic statement that the L-function is the Mellin transform of a modular form, or as a geometric statement that E is a quotient of a modular curve X0(N)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$X_0(N)$$\end{document}. For elliptic curves over number fields these notions diverge; a conjecture of Hamahata asserts that for every elliptic curve E over a totally real number field there is a correspondence between a Hilbert modular variety and the product of the conjugates of E. In this paper we prove the conjecture by explicit computation for many cases where E is defined over a real quadratic field and the geometric genus of the Hilbert modular variety is 1.