Recent Developments in Individual Difference Research to Inform the Adoption of AI Technology

被引:0
作者
Symasek, Luke [1 ]
Yeazitzis, Taylor [1 ]
Weger, Kristin [1 ]
Mesmer, Bryan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Huntsville, Dept Psychol, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Huntsville, Dept Ind & Syst Engn & Engn Management, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
来源
SYSTEMS | 2025年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
individual differences; acceptance; adoption; AI technology; COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; ACCEPTANCE MODEL; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; USER ACCEPTANCE; INTERNET BANKING; COGNITIVE-STYLE; PERCEIVED RISK; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/systems13030156
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has become one of the most frequently discussed subjects in the development of technology in recent years. Due to its incredible pattern recognition, it can help humans complete work much faster than before with little to no monetary cost. Despite the widespread impact that AI technologies have on various fields, acceptance and adoption of AI lag behind because of a wide range of factors among users. This paper outlines the results of a large literature review that attempts to tease out some of these factors by examining individual differences that may impact the acceptance and adoption of AI. This goal was achieved through an exploration of individual differences that play a role in the acceptance and adoption of new technologies more broadly, as well as AI technologies, to gain a more holistic understanding of the factors contributing to the lack of acceptance and adoption of AI. The main goal of this literature review was to find the individual differences (IDs) associated with the acceptance and adoption of AI technology and general technology. A secondary goal was to create a model based on the acceptance of general technology that could assist in future AI technology research, development, and implementation. This paper identifies several IDs that were found to play a role in the adoption and acceptance of AI technology, as well as 15 specific IDs that were commonly shown to play a role in the adoption and acceptance of general technology. Because of the rapid development of AI technologies in recent years, there is a lack of research examining the acceptance and adoption of AI technologies; however, there is a great deal of research examining the broader acceptance and adoption of technology, and there is significant overlap between the studies that examined general technology acceptance and adoption and those that examined AI-specific technology acceptance and adoption. Because of this, we believe that the research on general technology acceptance and adoption can be used as a foundation and inspiration for future research on AI technology in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [61] Malhotra Y., 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, VTrack1, P14, DOI DOI 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772658
  • [62] Direct and Indirect Associations of Personality With Audiovisual Technology Acceptance Through General Self-Efficacy
    Manolika, Maria
    Kotsakis, Rigas
    Matsiola, Maria
    Kalliris, George
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2022, 125 (02) : 1165 - 1185
  • [63] Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior
    Mathieson, Kieran
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1991, 2 (03) : 173 - 191
  • [64] McElroy JC, 2007, MIS QUART, V31, P809
  • [65] McLeod A., 2009, P 15 AM C INF SYST S
  • [66] The propensity to trust in (automated) technology mediates the links between technology self-efficacy and fear and acceptance of artificial intelligence
    Montag, Christian
    Kraus, Johannes
    Baumann, Martin
    Rozgonjuk, Dmitri
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2023, 11
  • [67] A survey of World Wide Web use in middle-aged and older adults
    Morrell, RW
    Mayhorn, CB
    Bennett, J
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2000, 42 (02) : 175 - 182
  • [68] Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration
    Mueller, Julie
    Wood, Eileen
    Willoughby, Teena
    Ross, Craig
    Specht, Jacqueline
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2008, 51 (04) : 1523 - 1537
  • [69] Okoli C, 2015, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V37, P879
  • [70] Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario
    Padilla-Melendez, Antonio
    Rosa del Aguila-Obra, Ana
    Garrido-Moreno, Aurora
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 63 : 306 - 317