Factors influencing pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy for advanced gastric cancer

被引:0
作者
Wang, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Li, Xiaoxia [1 ]
Huang, Jing [1 ]
Wu, Nianqiu [1 ]
Tang, Chenglu [1 ]
机构
[1] Fifth Hosp Wuhan, Dept Digest Syst, 122 Xianzheng St, Wuhan 430050, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH | 2025年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
Advanced gastric cancer; neoadjuvant therapy; pathological reaction; nomograph; CHEMOTHERAPY; ADENOCARCINOMA; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.62347/SKZE1345
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify the factors influencing pathological responses after neoadjuvant therapy in advanced gastric cancer and to construct an effective prediction model for an improved response. Methods: Clinical data from 100 patients with advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy at The Fifth Hospital of Wuhan from January 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Basic data, laboratory test results, and other patient information were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors influencing good disease recovery after neoadjuvant therapy. Based on the results of multi-factor analysis, a nomogram risk prediction model was constructed, and its effectiveness was validated. The model's discriminatory power was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area under the ROC curve (AUC), while its fit was evaluated using a calibration curve. The model's consistency was assessed using the HosmerLemeshow (HL) test. Results: Among the 100 patients, 22 (22%) had a good pathological response. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor differentiation, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), longest tumor diameter, and cN stage were significant factors influencing the pathological response of patients after neoadjuvant therapy. Based on the above indicators, a nomogram prediction model was constructed, with the following formula: Logit (P) = -1.653 + 1.562 x (tumor differentiation degree) + 1.925 x (CEA) + 1.620 x (longest tumor diameter) + 1.483 x (cN stage). The AUCs of the training set and the test set were 0.884 (95% CI: 0.778-0.990) and 0.861 (95% CI: 0.709-1.000), respectively. The HL test showed good fit (chi 2 = 4.939, P = 0.764). The calibration curve demonstrated that the predicted values closely matched the observed values. Conclusion: Tumor differentiation, CEA, longest tumor diameter, and cN stage are significant factors influencing the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in advanced gastric cancer. The prediction model developed based on these factors demonstrates good predictive performance and may aid in clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:2907 / 2915
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Becker, K
    Mueller, JD
    Schulmacher, C
    Ott, K
    Fink, U
    Busch, R
    Böttcher, K
    Siewert, JR
    Höfler, H
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 98 (07) : 1521 - 1530
  • [2] Capovilla G, 2022, CHIRURG, V93, P138, DOI 10.1007/s00104-021-01516-4
  • [3] Nomogram for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Chen, Yong-He
    Xiao, Jian
    Chen, Xi-Jie
    Wang, Hua-She
    Liu, Dan
    Xiang, Jun
    Peng, Jun-Sheng
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (19) : 2427 - 2439
  • [4] Risk factor analysis and nomogram construction of postoperative complications for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy
    Cui, Hao
    Zhang, Sijin
    Sun, Linde
    Yuan, Zhen
    Xu, Qixuan
    Gao, Jingwang
    Chen, Lin
    Cui, Jianxin
    Wei, Bo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [5] Adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to chemoradiation after D2 surgery for gastric cancer in the per-protocol analysis of the randomized CRITICS trial
    de Steur, W. O.
    van Amelsfoort, R. M.
    Hartgrink, H. H.
    Putter, H.
    Kranenbarg, E. Meershoek-Klein
    van Grieken, N. C. T.
    van Sandick, J. W.
    Claassen, Y. H. M.
    Braak, J. P. B. M.
    Jansen, E. P. M.
    Sikorska, K.
    van Tinteren, H.
    Walraven, I
    Lind, P.
    Nordsmark, M.
    Henegouwen, M. I. van Berge
    van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
    Cats, A.
    Verheij, M.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 (03) : 360 - 367
  • [6] Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of preoperative P-SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for progressive gastric cancer-construction of a clinical prediction model
    Feng, Long
    Shao, Lei
    Sun, Shuangshuang
    Zhang, Chengwu
    Cai, Baojia
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (12): : 13031 - 13040
  • [7] Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Approaches to Gastric Cancer
    Fong, Caroline
    Johnston, Edwina
    Starling, Naureen
    [J]. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 (09) : 1247 - 1268
  • [8] Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition)
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2021, 24 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [9] Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics nomogram for early prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer
    Li, Jing
    Yin, Hongkun
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Hongkai
    Ma, Fei
    Li, Hailiang
    Qu, Jinrong
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (04) : 2746 - 2756
  • [10] Development and validation of a nomogram to predict pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with PD-1 antibodies
    Li, Liang
    Chen, Guanglong
    Chen, Emerson Y.
    Strickland, Matthew R.
    Zhao, Weijie
    Zhang, Jialin
    Li, Zhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (06) : 2373 - 2383