Consequences of expanded vocationally oriented programs for gender segregation and inequality: The case of Japanese higher education

被引:2
作者
Uchikoshi, Fumiya [1 ]
Toyonaga, Kohei [2 ]
Teramoto, Erika [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Kindai Univ, Higashiosaka, Japan
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Gender; Higher education; Horizontal stratification; Vocational education; Japan; WOMENS EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES; OCCUPATIONAL SEX SEGREGATION; WELFARE-STATE PARADOX; POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION; COLLEGE MAJOR; ACCESS; FIELDS; SELECTIVITY; EXPANSION; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101024
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
In this paper, we integrate two bodies of literature on higher education-horizontal stratification and gender segregation-to generate new insights into the consequences of the increase in vocationally oriented programs for gender segregation and inequality. We specifically examine the case of Japan, where college expansion and women's increasing enrollment in four-year universities have been driven by the proliferation of nonselective private sectors. Two sets of analyses using administrative and survey data reveal the following findings. First, the relative increase in female enrollments in private institutions is driven by the growth of vocationally oriented programs, which typically offer publicly certified licenses for female-dominant occupations. If there was no such increase, then gender segregation in terms of fields of study would have decreased more than observed. Second, we find that those from low socioeconomic background are more likely to be enrolled in vocational fields such as nursing, education and home economics. These results suggest that women's increased college attendance in Japan contributes to the growth of double gender segregation in terms of fields of study and institutional selectivity by incorporating less privileged women into these sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Women in higher education [J].
Amano, M .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1997, 34 (02) :215-235
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CONDITION ED 2019
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The pursuit of gender equality: An uphill battle, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264281318-EN, 10.1787/9789264281318-en]
[4]  
Arum R., 2007, Stratification in higher education: A comparative study, P1
[5]   Some Things Never Change: Gender Segregation in Higher Education across Eight Nations and Three Decades [J].
Barone, Carlo .
SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2011, 84 (02) :157-176
[6]   THE DECLINE IN OCCUPATIONAL SEX SEGREGATION DURING THE 1970S - CENSUS AND CPS COMPARISONS [J].
BIANCHI, SM ;
RYTINA, N .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1986, 23 (01) :79-86
[7]   OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION BY SEX - TRENDS AND PROSPECTS [J].
BLAU, FD ;
HENDRICKS, WE .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1979, 14 (02) :197-210
[8]   Explaining educational differentials - Towards a formal rational action theory [J].
Breen, R ;
Goldthorpe, JH .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1997, 9 (03) :275-305
[9]   Babies, Work, or Both? Highly Educated Women's Employment and Fertility in East Asia1 [J].
Brinton, Mary C. ;
Oh, Eunsil .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 125 (01) :105-140
[10]   Gender-Role Ideology, Labor Market Institutions, and Post-industrial Fertility [J].
Brinton, Mary C. ;
Lee, Dong-Ju .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2016, 42 (03) :405-+