Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ): Validation in Polish Patients with Aortic Stenosis

被引:0
作者
Swiatoniowska-Lonc, Natalia [1 ]
Sciborski, Krzysztof [1 ]
Styra, Rima [2 ]
Lueske, Claudia M. [3 ]
Wegrzynowska-Teodorczyk, Kinga [1 ,4 ]
Frank, Derk [5 ]
Bramlage, Peter [3 ]
Banasiak, Waldemar [1 ,6 ]
Doroszko, Adrian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] 4th Mil Hosp, Ctr Heart Dis, Dept Cardiol, PL-50981 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Ctr Mental Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Inst Pharmacol & Prevent Med, D-49661 Cloppenburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hlth & Sport Sci Wroclaw, Fac Physiotherapy, PL-50375 Wroclaw, Poland
[5] Univ Clin Ctr Schleswig Holstein, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[6] Wroclaw Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Clin Dept Cardiol, PL-51612 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
aortic stenosis; cardiovascular disease; quality of life; quality of life measures; EXERCISE-STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALVE IMPLANTATION; RISK STRATIFICATION; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm14072502
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Quality of life (QoL) is recognized as a clinically significant outcome measure among patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, there is no validated, AS-specific questionnaire available in Poland for assessing the QoL in AS patients. The aim of the study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (the TASQ). Methods: The study involved 113 patients with severe AS (including 59 women), aged 74 to 82 years [mean age 77 years], hospitalized at the department of cardiology in 2024. The standardized questionnaires were used to assess the level of QoL, the TASQ, and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (the MLHFQ). Results: The mean QoL level assessed by the TASQ was 60.72 +/- 22.82. The Cronbach's alpha for the entire TASQ was 0.919, for the emotional impact subscale 0.873, and for the physical limitation subscale 0.861. Satisfactory values of fit measures were obtained for a five-factor structure (RMSEA < 0.01; CFI > 0.99). The loadings of each item were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The MLHFQ score correlated significantly (p < 0.001) and positively (r > 0) with the score on the scales of physical symptoms (r = 0.479), physical limitations (r = 0.662), social limitations (r = 0.597), emotional impact (r = 0.638), and overall QoL (r = 0.712). Conclusions: Patients with severe AS exhibit low QoL. The TASQ has very good psychometric properties and can be used to assess the QoL in the population of Polish patients with AS.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Neighborhood socioeconomic status and aortic stenosis: A Swedish study based on nationwide registries and an echocardiographic screening cohort
    Andell, Pontus
    Li, Xinjun
    Martinsson, Andreas
    Nilsson, Peter M.
    Zoller, Bengt
    Smith, J. Gustav
    Sundquist, Kristina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 318 : 153 - 159
  • [2] The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on quality of life: A mixed methods study
    Astin, Felicity
    Horrocks, Judith
    McLenachan, Jim
    Blackman, Daniel J.
    Stephenson, John
    Closs, S. Jose
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 2017, 46 (06): : 432 - 438
  • [3] Impact of severe aortic stenosis on quality of life
    Baena, Juan Manuel Gracia
    Mora, Josep Ramon Marsal
    Cardenosa, Sara Llorca
    Vall, Imma Calaf
    Zielonka, Marta
    Godoy, Pere
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06):
  • [4] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [5] BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • [6] Measuring What Matters Most in Aortic Stenosis: Is It Time for Disease-Specific Measurement?
    Borregaard, Britt
    Lauck, Sandra B.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 148 (06) : 571 - 573
  • [7] Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities
    Capoulade R.
    Pibarot P.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2015, 17 (11)
  • [8] What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making
    Col, Nananda F.
    Otero, Diana M.
    Lindman, Brian R.
    Horne, Aaron
    Levack, Melissa M.
    Ngo, Long
    Goodloe, Kimberly
    Strong, Susan
    Kaplan, Elvin
    Beaudry, Melissa
    Coylewright, Megan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [9] Czerwik-Kulpa M, 2010, ACTA NEUROPSYCHOL, V8, P244, DOI 10.1080/23809000.2017.1400911
  • [10] euroqol.org, EQ-5D-5L-EQ-5D