The role of far-right party performance in shaping disinformation concerns of European voters: evidence from the 2024 European Parliament elections

被引:0
作者
Gattermann, Katjana [1 ]
van den Hoogen, Elske [1 ]
de Vreese, Claes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, POB 15791, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Disinformation; far right; motivated reasoning; populism; voter behaviour; winner-loser gap; MEDIA; POPULISM; CITIZENS; PEOPLE; NEWS;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2025.2489088
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Concerns about the risk of disinformation in the 2024 European Parliament elections were widespread in European capitals. Simultaneously, the far-right - often linked to the spread of disinformation - gained significant vote shares in these elections. This article therefore asks: To what extent and how does far-right election performance impact disinformation concerns of European voters in the aftermath of the elections? We posit that the election context moderates the extent to which motivated reasoning-related factors - i.e., election winning and not holding populist attitudes, explain variation in voters' disinformation concerns and analyse survey data from the 2024 European Election Study conducted in all 27 EU countries to test this. Our results suggest that the electoral context may not only structure the magnitude of disinformation concerns directly, but the heightened presence of far-right parties in the electoral arena adds insecurity, in such way that winners and non-populist voters are no longer less concerned about disinformation. Thereby, our findings have important implications for disinformation research and European democracy.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [51] The PopuList: A Database of Populist, Far-Left, and Far-Right Parties Using Expert-Informed Qualitative Comparative Classification (EiQCC)
    Rooduijn, Matthijs
    Pirro, Andrea L. P.
    Halikiopoulou, Daphne
    Froio, Caterina
    Van Kessel, Stijn
    De Lange, Sarah L.
    Mudde, Cas
    Taggart, Paul
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 54 (03) : 969 - 978
  • [52] We Are the People and You Are Fake News: A Social Identity Approach to Populist Citizens' False Consensus and Hostile Media Perceptions
    Schulz, Anne
    Wirth, Werner
    Mueller, Philipp
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2020, 47 (02) : 201 - 226
  • [53] Steven Martin., 2022, European Politics and Society, V0, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/23745118.2022.2065725
  • [54] What makes people believe that their party won the election?
    Stiers, Dieter
    Daoust, Jean-Francois
    Blais, Andre
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2018, 55 : 21 - 29
  • [55] MOTIVATED SKEPTICISM IN THE EVALUATION OF POLITICAL BELIEFS (2006)
    Taber, Charles S.
    Lodge, Milton
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEW, 2012, 24 (02) : 157 - 184
  • [56] THE SCOPE AND GENERALITY OF AUTOMATIC AFFECTIVE BIASES IN POLITICAL THINKING: REPLY TO THE SYMPOSIUM
    Taber, Charles S.
    Lodge, Milton
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEW, 2012, 24 (02) : 247 - 268
  • [57] Protecting Democracy from Disinformation: Normative Threats and Policy Responses
    Tenove, Chris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2020, 25 (03) : 517 - 537
  • [58] When Do Parties Lie? Misinformation and Radical-Right Populism Across 26 Countries
    Tornberg, Petter
    Chueri, Juliana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2025,
  • [59] What Does the EU Actually Mean to Citizens? An in-Depth Study of Dutch citizens' Understandings and Evaluations of the European Union
    van den Hoogen, Elske
    de Koster, Willem
    van der Waal, Jeroen
    [J]. JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2022, 60 (05) : 1432 - 1448
  • [60] You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news
    van der Linden, Sander
    Panagopoulos, Costas
    Roozenbeek, Jon
    [J]. MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2020, 42 (03) : 460 - 470