Assessing Structural Performance: A Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method

被引:0
作者
Sadeghi, Sara [1 ]
Mahmoudi Kamelabad, Mehdi [1 ]
Kamelnia, Hamed [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Architecture and Urbanism, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan
[2] Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad
关键词
AHP; Architecture; Qualitative performances; Quantitative assessment; Structural performances;
D O I
10.1007/s40030-024-00862-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The study introduces a framework for evaluating architectural structures by integrating qualitative and quantitative criteria. The research begins with a literature review to identify key factors influencing structural performance. Experts refined and categorized these factors using the Delphi method. The DEMATEL method was applied to evaluate the interconnections and significance of the criteria, showing that mechanical and environmental factors were the most impactful, with mechanical aspects assigned the highest weight of 0.376. Aesthetic considerations were nearly as significant as environmental factors, highlighting their importance in contemporary architectural evaluation. The AHP method was used to determine the final weights, with all inconsistency rates below 0.1, indicating reliable results. The study's findings underscore the need for a balanced approach in architectural design, integrating qualitative factors alongside traditional quantitative measures. This comprehensive framework offers a more holistic evaluation of structural performance, advancing both academic research and practical application in architecture. The research highlights the importance of considering aesthetic and environmental aspects in addition to mechanical and economic factors, contributing to more sustainable and visually appealing architectural designs. © The Institution of Engineers (India) 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 356
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Tzeng G.-H., Chiang C.-H., Li C.-W., evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Syst. Appl, 32, 4, pp. 1028-1044, (2007)
[2]  
Macdonald A.J., Structural design for architecture, (1997)
[3]  
Jones A., Brown B., Extended focus on environmental criteria in architectural performance evaluation, J.Sustain. Archit, 15, 3, pp. 112-130, (2020)
[4]  
Saaty T.L., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, Eur. J. Oper. Res, 48, pp. 9-26, (1990)
[5]  
Van der Merwe A., Decision support systems for design and evaluation of architectural performance, (2015)
[6]  
Chen H., Xu X., Zhang Q., The influence of modularity and flexibility in modern structural designs, J. Archit. Eng, 27, 3, pp. 234-245, (2021)
[7]  
Dzwigol H., Multi-criteria decision analysis in quantitative research, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 184, (2023)
[8]  
Engel H., Tragsysteme, Structure Systems, (2009)
[9]  
Lin S., Huang Z., Comparative design structures: concepts and zethodologies, (2016)
[10]  
Islami G., Hadafi F., An introduction to the position of the structure in the explanation of architecture and its necessity in objectifying the architectural body, (2011)