The Impact of Environmental Protection Expenditures on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions

被引:0
作者
Yilmaz, Serdar [1 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Inst Global Dept, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
environmental protection expenditures; greenhouse gas emissions; climate change; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE; CO2; EMISSIONS; DETERMINANTS; COUNTRIES; QUALITY; EU;
D O I
10.3390/su17073192
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to address the adverse impacts of climate change, international initiatives, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, are setting targets to governments and asking them to commit to take action. In pursuit of fulfilling these commitments, countries have set national goals, reflecting their policy choices, local contexts and capabilities, to fight against climate change. Given that governments implement their commitments through their budgets, environmental protection expenditures (EPEs) are the major tool that governments use to fight against climate change. This study investigated the extent to which EPEs are effective in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a major contributor to climate change. Our results provide some evidence that the increase in EPEs has led to a reduction in GHG emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries
    Abid, Mehdi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 188 : 183 - 194
  • [2] Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis
    Adewuyi, Adeolu O.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 : 489 - 506
  • [3] Comparative benefits of environmental protection expenditures and environmental taxes in driving environmental quality of the European countries
    Akdag, Saffet
    Yildirim, Hakan
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2024,
  • [4] Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 685 : 702 - 709
  • [5] How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?
    Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Roubaud, David
    Farhani, Sahbi
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 113 : 356 - 367
  • [6] Efficiency of Environmental Protection Expenditures in EU Countries
    Barrell, Alan
    Dobrzanski, Pawel
    Bobowski, Sebastian
    Siuda, Krzysztof
    Chmielowiec, Szymon
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [7] Are bigger governments better providers of public goods? Evidence from air pollution
    Bernauer, Thomas
    Koubi, Vally
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2013, 156 (3-4) : 593 - 609
  • [8] SERIAL-CORRELATION AND THE FIXED EFFECTS MODEL
    BHARGAVA, A
    FRANZINI, L
    NARENDRANATHAN, W
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1982, 49 (04) : 533 - 549
  • [9] Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework
    Borucke, Michael
    Moore, David
    Cranston, Gemma
    Gracey, Kyle
    Iha, Katsunori
    Larson, Joy
    Lazarus, Elias
    Morales, Juan Carlos
    Wackernagel, Mathis
    Galli, Alessandro
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 : 518 - 533
  • [10] The role of environmental protection expenditures and renewable energy consumption in the context of ecological challenges: Insights from the European Union with the novel panel econometric approach*
    Caglar, Abdullah Emre
    Yavuz, Ersin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 331