Premises, practices and politics of co-creation for urban sustainability transitions

被引:0
作者
Niki Frantzeskaki [1 ]
Marcus Collier [2 ]
Katharina Hölscher [1 ]
Idil Gaziulusoy [3 ]
Alessandro Ossola [4 ]
Patricia Albulescu [5 ]
Marcelline Bonneau [6 ]
Sara Borgstrom [7 ]
Stuart Connop [8 ]
Adina Dumitru [9 ]
Davide Geneletti [10 ]
Leen Gorissen [11 ]
Meike Levin-Keitel [12 ]
Tadhg MacIntyre [13 ]
Irina Mascinga [5 ]
Siobhan McQuaid [14 ]
Samuel Tabory [15 ]
Timo von Wirth [16 ]
Paula Vandergert [8 ]
Peter Vos [17 ]
Gil Penha-Lopes [18 ]
Ina Säumel [19 ]
Thomas Wachtel [19 ]
Julia Wittmayer [20 ]
机构
[1] Utrecht University,Human Geography and Spatial Planning
[2] Trinity College Dublin,School of Natural Sciences
[3] Aalto University,Department of Design, School of Art, Design and Architecture
[4] University of California,Department of Plant Sciences
[5] Davis,Department of Sustainable development, environmental science and engineering
[6] West University of Timişoara,Sustainability Research Institute
[7] Resilia Solutions,Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences
[8] KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering
[9] University of East London,Faculty of Spatial Planning
[10] University of A Coruña,Department of Psychology
[11] University of Trento,Trinity Business School
[12] Centre4NI,Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human
[13] TU Dortmund University,Environment Systems (IRI THESys)
[14] Maynooth University,Dutch Research Institute For Transitions
[15] Trinity College Dublin,undefined
[16] University of Minnesota,undefined
[17] Hocheschule Frankfurt,undefined
[18] City of Genk,undefined
[19] University of Lisbon,undefined
[20] Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin,undefined
[21] Erasmus University Rotterdam,undefined
来源
Urban Transformations | / 7卷 / 1期
关键词
Co-creation; Urban governance; Transdisciplinary research; Transitions; Knowledge; Policy;
D O I
10.1186/s42854-025-00075-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Co-creation is becoming a widely used mode of urban governance and research for city-making and city-transitioning being conceptually entangled with experimentation, innovation and collaboration. In this paper, we address three questions to systematize knowledge about and advancing the research and practice of co-creation: Why co-create? How to co-create? With whom to co-create? We first present three distinct premises of co-creation that respond to the question of why to co-create, and mark advantages of co-creation in comparison to participatory processes: bridging and weaving knowledge for place-based urban transitions, emancipating urban policy and planning, and advancing research to transformative and transdisciplinary approaches that are socially relevant. We then present key practices and skills required for engaging in and organizing co-creation processes (i.e., how to co-create). Next to advocacy, communication, leadership, and organizational skills, we identify that creativity, playfulness, emotional intelligence, receptivity, and collaborative learning are important, yet often overlooked, skills and capabilities for co-creation. Finally, we investigate the politics of co-creation through the lens who is included in co-creation and how (i.e., with whom to co-create). We discuss future research on co-creation and its applications centered on measuring its impact against its premises while recognizing the importance of having different metrics and reflexive measures that can evaluate its deep impact and its relation to urban transitions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据