Can verbal instructions aimed at being more reflective reduce threat-induced impulsivity?

被引:0
作者
Fridland, Ellen [1 ]
Gladwin, Thomas E. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, London, England
[2] Univ Greenwich, Inst Lifecourse Dev, London, England
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Inst Globally Distributed Open Res & Educ IGDORE, London, England
关键词
Reflective; reappraisal; visualisation; loving-kindness; impulsivity; COGNITIVE BIAS MODIFICATION; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; MENTAL PRACTICE; MODEL; MEDITATION; ADDICTION; KINDNESS; SYSTEMS; HEALTH; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1080/20445911.2025.2499192
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whether reflective processes can control impulsive processes is of both theoretical and applied interest. Interventions targeting reflective processes have been suggested to change how individuals react to emotional stimuli, but it is unclear under which conditions behavioural measures of impulsivity can be demonstrably influenced. In the current study, participants were given repeated instructions (varied between-subjects) related to reappraisal, visualisation, or loving-kindness meditation, or a baseline condition. Participants then performed blocks of an emotional Go/Nogo task known to evoke threat-induced impulsivity on both reaction time and accuracy contrasts. Effects of instructions were tested on these contrasts. Results showed no significant effects of instructions. Further, the null model was supported by Akaike's Information Criterion and by Bayes Factors. The results thus contribute to knowledge on the nature of reflective-to-impulsive influence, by demonstrating an absence of an effect for the current instruction method and the current measure of impulsive processing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, MATLAB, V8.6th
  • [2] Bargh J.A., 1994, Handbook of Social Cognition, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00572-005-0022-9
  • [3] Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition
    Bishop, SR
    Lau, M
    Shapiro, S
    Carlson, L
    Anderson, ND
    Carmody, J
    Segal, ZV
    Abbey, S
    Speca, M
    Velting, D
    Devins, G
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2004, 11 (03) : 230 - 241
  • [4] Strong Claims and Weak Evidence: Reassessing the Predictive Validity of the IAT
    Blanton, Hart
    Klick, Jonathan
    Mitchell, Gregory
    Jaccard, James
    Mellers, Barbara
    Tetlock, Philip E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (03) : 567 - 582
  • [5] Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding Saccades
    Boucher, Leanne
    Palmeri, Thomas J.
    Logan, Gordon D.
    Schall, Jeffrey D.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (02) : 376 - 397
  • [6] Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?
    Bruin, KJ
    Wijers, AA
    van Staveren, ASJ
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (09) : 1660 - 1671
  • [7] Pavlovian impatience: The anticipation of immediate rewards increases approach behaviour
    Burghoorn, Floor
    Scheres, Anouk
    Monterosso, John
    Guo, Mingqian
    Luo, Shan
    Roelofs, Karin
    Figner, Bernd
    [J]. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 25 (02) : 358 - 376
  • [8] AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons
    Burnham, Kenneth P.
    Anderson, David R.
    Huyvaert, Kathryn P.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2011, 65 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [9] Online versus offline: The Web as a medium for response time data collection
    Chetverikov, Andrey
    Upravitelev, Philipp
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2016, 48 (03) : 1086 - 1099
  • [10] Absence of evidence or evidence of absence: reflecting on therapeutic implementations of attentional bias modification
    Clarke, Patrick J. F.
    Notebaert, Lies
    MacLeod, Colin
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14