Survival outcomes after pathologic complete response with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective national database study

被引:1
作者
Nierenberg, Tori C. [1 ]
Thomas, Samantha M. [2 ,3 ]
Halliday, Ian [1 ]
van den Bruele, Astrid Botty [1 ,3 ]
Chiba, Akiko [1 ,3 ]
Parrish, Kendra J. Modell [1 ,3 ]
Woriax, Hannah E. [1 ,3 ]
DiNome, Maggie L. [1 ,3 ]
Westbrook, Kelly E. [3 ,4 ]
Plichta, Jennifer K. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Durham 27710, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy; Endocrine therapy; Chemotherapy; Pathologic complete response; Estrogen positive breast cancer; POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; ANASTROZOLE; TAMOXIFEN; LETROZOLE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-025-07717-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Neoadjuvant therapies can result in pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer, which can be predictive of long-term outcomes. Patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER +) tumors may receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). We sought to compare survival outcomes in those with non-metastatic ER + breast cancer who received NET or NAC and achieved pCR. Methods All patients diagnosed with ER + /HER2- stage I-III breast cancer, who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by surgery, and achieved pCR, were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB, 2010-2021). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), and log-rank tests were used to test for differences in OS. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to estimate the association of NAC vs NET with OS, after adjustment for covariates. Results 3313 patients met eligibility criteria: 3148 received NAC and 165 NET. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 82 months (95% CI 80.4-83.1). Patients who received NAC were significantly younger (median age: NAC 49y vs NET 64y; p < 0.001), more likely to have a comorbidity score of 0 (NAC 89.3% vs NET 81.2%, p = 0.004), and more likely to have private insurance (NAC 68.9% vs NET 44.2%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the NAC and NET patients based on race and ethnicity, income, education, or community type (all p > 0.05). The NAC treated patients were more likely to have larger tumors [median tumor size (IQR): NAC 3 cm (2.0-4.3) vs NET 1.3 cm (0.7-2.8); p < 0.001)], ductal histology (NAC 92.6% vs 81.2%, p < 0.001), and grade 3 tumors (NAC 70.2% vs 10.3%, p < 0.001). In the unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no significant difference in OS between NAC vs NET [5-year OS: NAC 0.935 vs NET 0.916; p = 0.08]. After adjustment for demographics, disease characteristics, and treatments, there remained no association between OS and study group (NAC vs NET; p = 0.63). Conclusions Patients with ER + /HER2- early-stage breast cancer who achieved pCR had similar OS, regardless of whether they received NAC or NET. As such, pCR appears to have similar prognostic value irrespective of the type of systemic therapy used to obtain this favorable outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 172
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Ki-67 index value and progesterone receptor status can predict prognosis and suitable treatment in node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative tumors [J].
Arima, Nobuyuki ;
Nishimura, Reiki ;
Osako, Tomofumi ;
Okumura, Yasuhiro ;
Nakano, Masahiro ;
Fujisue, Mamiko ;
Nishiyama, Yasuyuki ;
Toyozumi, Yasuo .
ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 17 (01) :616-622
[2]   Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives [J].
Barchiesi, Giacomo ;
Mazzotta, Marco ;
Krasniqi, Eriseld ;
Pizzuti, Laura ;
Marinelli, Daniele ;
Capomolla, Elisabetta ;
Sergi, Domenico ;
Amodio, Antonella ;
Natoli, Clara ;
Gamucci, Teresa ;
Vizza, Enrico ;
Marchetti, Paolo ;
Botti, Claudio ;
Sanguineti, Giuseppe ;
Ciliberto, Gennaro ;
Barba, Maddalena ;
Vici, Patrizia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (10)
[3]   Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer [J].
Cantini, Luca ;
Trapani, Dario ;
Guidi, Lorenzo ;
Bielo, Luca Boscolo ;
Scafetta, Roberta ;
Koziej, Marcin ;
Vidal, Laura ;
Saini, Kamal S. ;
Curigliano, Giuseppe .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2024, 123
[4]   Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy as an Alternative to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: Pathologic and Surgical Outcomes [J].
Cao, Lifen ;
Sugumar, Kavin ;
Keller, Eleanor ;
Li, Pamela ;
Rock, Lisa ;
Simpson, Ashley ;
Freyvogel, Mary ;
Montero, Alberto J. ;
Shenk, Robert ;
Miller, Megan E. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (10) :5730-5741
[5]   Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer - The Pre-Operative "Arimidex" Compared to Tamoxilen (PROAC7) trial [J].
Cataliotti, L ;
Buzdar, AU ;
Noguchi, S ;
Bines, J ;
Takatsuka, Y ;
Petrakova, K ;
Dube, P ;
de Oliveira, CT .
CANCER, 2006, 106 (10) :2095-2103
[6]   Quality of Cancer Recurrence Data in the National Cancer Database: A Reappraisal of Reporting Readiness [J].
Chan, Kelley ;
Palis, Bryan E. ;
Cotler, Joseph H. ;
Janczewski, Lauren M. ;
Zhu, Xuan ;
Boffa, Daniel J. ;
Park, Ko Un ;
Boughey, Judy C. ;
Plichta, Jennifer K. ;
In, Haejin ;
Nogueira, Leticia M. ;
Yabroff, Robin K. ;
Hawhee, Vicki M. ;
Merriman, Kelly W. ;
Habermann, Elizabeth B. ;
Williams, Vonetta L. ;
Mason, Karen ;
Mullett, Timothy W. ;
Weigel, Ronald J. ;
Nelson, Heidi .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (03) :1553-1564
[7]   Trends in Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Use and Impact on Rates of Breast Conservation in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Data Base Study [J].
Chiba, Akiko ;
Hoskin, Tanya L. ;
Heins, Courtney N. ;
Hunt, Kelly K. ;
Habermann, Elizabeth B. ;
Boughey, Judy C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (02) :418-424
[8]   Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis [J].
Cortazar, Patricia ;
Zhang, Lijun ;
Untch, Michael ;
Mehta, Keyur ;
Costantino, Joseph P. ;
Wolmark, Norman ;
Bonnefoi, Herve ;
Cameron, David ;
Gianni, Luca ;
Valagussa, Pinuccia ;
Swain, Sandra M. ;
Prowell, Tatiana ;
Loibl, Sibylle ;
Wickerham, D. Lawrence ;
Bogaerts, Jan ;
Baselga, Jose ;
Perou, Charles ;
Blumenthal, Gideon ;
Blohmer, Jens ;
Mamounas, Eleftherios P. ;
Bergh, Jonas ;
Semiglazov, Vladimir ;
Justice, Robert ;
Eidtmann, Holger ;
Paik, Soonmyung ;
Piccart, Martine ;
Sridhara, Rajeshwari ;
Fasching, Peter A. ;
Slaets, Leen ;
Tang, Shenghui ;
Gerber, Bernd ;
Geyer, Charles E., Jr. ;
Pazdur, Richard ;
Ditsch, Nina ;
Rastogi, Priya ;
Eiermann, Wolfgang ;
von Minckwitz, Gunter .
LANCET, 2014, 384 (9938) :164-172
[9]   Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics [J].
Ellis, Matthew J. ;
Tao, Yu ;
Luo, Jingqin ;
A'Hern, Roger ;
Evans, Dean B. ;
Bhatnagar, Ajay S. ;
Ross, Hilary A. Chaudri ;
von Kameke, Alexander ;
Miller, William R. ;
Smith, Ian ;
Eiermann, Wolfgang ;
Dowsett, Mitch .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (19) :1380-1388
[10]   Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial [J].
Ellis, Matthew J. ;
Ma, Cynthia .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 105 (Suppl 1) :33-43