Care Continuity, Nephrologists' Dialysis Facility Preferences, and Outcomes

被引:0
作者
Lin, Eugene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lung, Khristina I. [2 ]
Rapista, Derick [2 ]
Kuo, Leane S. [2 ,4 ]
Lakdawalla, Darius [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Peneva, Desi [2 ,3 ]
Van Nuys, Karen [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Leonard D Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Sol Price Sch Publ Policy, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Populat & Publ Hlth Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Alfred E Mann Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmaceut & Hlth Econ, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2025年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; SOCIAL RISK-FACTORS; STRUCTURAL RACISM; DISPARITIES; MORTALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; BENEFICIARIES;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0423; 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0423
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance Patients may initiate dialysis at their predialysis nephrologists' primary facilities (ie, where the nephrologist saw the most patients) to preserve continuity of care, even if the facilities are of low quality. Patients from minoritized racial and ethnic groups may be the most negatively impacted. Objective To examine starts at nephrologists' primary facilities, downstream outcomes, and racial disparities in dialysis start quality. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used Medicare administrative data of patients initiating dialysis at freestanding US dialysis facilities from January 1, 2015, to October 31, 2020, with 1 year of follow-up (ending October 31, 2021). Analyses concluded January 26, 2025. Participants were adults with fee-for-service Medicare initiating dialysis. Exposures Quality of nephrologists' primary facilities (using publicly available 5-star ratings) and primary facilities' proximity to patients. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were starting dialysis at the nephrologist's primary facility (ie, primary facility starts), whether the starting facility was high quality (ie, 4-star or 5-star ratings), mortality and hospitalization rates, and racial and ethnic disparities in high-quality primary facilities and in starting dialysis at high-quality facilities. Analyses used multivariable linear and Poisson regression with hospital service area fixed effects (unique intercepts for each area). Results Of 143 776 adults (median [IQR] age, 73 [67-79] years; 64 447 female [45%]; 4989 Asian [3%]; 28 515 Black [20%]; 11 296 Hispanic [8%]; 96 639 non-Hispanic White [67%]), 64 186 (45%) had managing nephrologists with high-quality primary facilities. Primary facility starts were lower as the primary facility's quality increased (0.5 percentage points [pp] lower for every 1-star increase in rating; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8 pp; P = .03). In contrast, primary facility starts were 33.9 pp (95% CI, 33.0-34.9 pp; P < .001) more likely when primary facilities were close to patients than when distant. Each additional quality star in nephrologists' primary facility was associated with more 4-star or 5-star facility starts (7.4 pp; 95% CI, 6.9-7.9 pp) and 4.5 fewer hospitalizations per 100 person-years (95% CI, 2.8-6.1 hospitalizations per 100 person-years). Compared with White patients, Black patients were 2.8 pp (95% CI, 1.7-3.9 pp) less likely to start at 4-star or 5-star facilities and 2.0 pp (95% CI, 1.0-3.0 pp) less likely to be treated by nephrologists with 4-star or 5-star primary facilities. Conclusions and Relevance Primary facility starts were common even when they were low quality, and outcomes were worse when nephrologists had low-quality primary facilities. Black patients disproportionately start dialysis at low-quality facilities and are less likely to have nephrologists with high-quality primary facilities. Policies that promote improved access to high-quality dialysis facilities may be necessary to alleviate these disparities.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program [J].
Abaluck, Jason ;
Gruber, Jonathan .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (04) :1180-1210
[2]   Association of medical tests use with care continuity in primary care service: evidence from the Department of Veterans Affairs [J].
Akunna, Adebola A. ;
Ahuja, Vishal ;
Halm, Ethan A. ;
Alvarez, Carlos A. .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2023, 40 (02) :338-344
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual: Chapter 2 - Inpatient psychiatric hospital services
[4]  
[Anonymous], Google Maps Platform, Google
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, QUALITY PAYMENT PROG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, American community survey
[7]   Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions [J].
Bailey, Zinzi D. ;
Krieger, Nancy ;
Agenor, Madina ;
Graves, Jasmine ;
Linos, Natalia ;
Bassett, Mary T. .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10077) :1453-1463
[8]   Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review [J].
Baker, Richard ;
Freeman, George K. ;
Haggerty, Jeannie L. ;
Bankart, M. John ;
Nockels, Keith H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2020, 70 (698) :E600-E611
[9]   Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate [J].
Benjamini, Yoav ;
Krieger, Abba M. ;
Yekutieli, Daniel .
BIOMETRIKA, 2006, 93 (03) :491-507
[10]   Addressing Financial Disincentives to Improve CKD Care [J].
Berns, Jeffrey S. ;
Saffer, Tonya L. ;
Lin, Eugene .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 29 (11) :2610-2612