The effect of electricity time-of-use plans: Evidence from the industrial sector in China

被引:0
作者
Li , Lingfang [1 ]
Qiu, Jiehong [1 ]
Fang, Gang [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Haitian Horizon Technol Serv Corp, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TOU; Electricity; Staggered DID; Two-way fixed effects; Power grid; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY; HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICITY; DEMAND; PRICES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102390
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Time-of-use (TOU) pricing plans are crucial energy market mechanisms implemented worldwide. Using a staggered difference-in-differences research design and hourly electricity data from industrial customers, this study goes beyond simply assessing the effectiveness of TOU pricing. It investigates under which circumstances TOU pricing may effectively contribute to peak shaving and valley filling. Our results indicate that high-peak-price TOU pricing may induce peak-shaving effects for both large- and small-scale industrial customers but does not lead to valley filling. Conversely, low-peak-price TOU pricing increases electricity consumption among large-scale industrial customers, regardless of whether it is a peak or valley period. In terms of expenditure, the shift from a flat rate to TOU pricing is associated with a 1.7 % reduction in monthly electricity costs for large-scale industrial customers. Furthermore, high-peak-price TOU pricing significantly improves demand stability, leading to a 4.7 % reduction in the peak-to-valley load ratio.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Abrate Graziano, 2008, International Journal of Applied Management Science, V1, P21, DOI 10.1504/IJAMS.2008.020037
[2]   The long-run price sensitivity dynamics of industrial and residential electricity demand: The impact of deregulating electricity prices [J].
Adorn, Philip Kofi .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 62 :43-60
[3]   COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER RESPONSE TO TIME-OF-USE ELECTRICITY PRICES - SOME EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS [J].
AIGNER, DJ ;
HIRSCHBERG, JG .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1985, 16 (03) :341-355
[4]   Rethinking real-time electricity pricing [J].
Allcott, Hunt .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (04) :820-842
[5]   Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2022, 226 (01) :62-79
[6]   Making the Best of the Second-Best: Welfare Consequences of Time-Varying Electricity Prices [J].
Blonz, Joshua A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2022, 9 (06) :1087-1126
[7]   Measuring market inefficiencies in California's restructured wholesale electricity market [J].
Borenstein, S ;
Bushnell, JB ;
Wolak, FA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) :1376-1405
[8]   Pricing Patterns in Wholesale Electricity Markets: Unilateral Market Power or Coordinated Behavior? [J].
Brown, David P. ;
Eckert, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 70 (01) :168-216
[9]   Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods [J].
Callaway, Brantly ;
Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 225 (02) :200-230
[10]  
Cameron A.Colin., 2005, MICROECONOMETRICS ME