Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Tomas, Tomas [1 ,2 ]
Apostolopoulos, Vasileios [1 ,2 ]
Brancik, Pavel [1 ,2 ]
Nachtnebl, Lubos [1 ,2 ]
Mahdal, Michal [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Annes Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg 1, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Med, Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
Revision total hip arthroplasty; Cemented femoral stem; Implant survival; Radiographic assessment; Harris hip score; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-025-06526-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeRevision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is an increasingly common procedure due to the growing number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed worldwide. This study evaluates the long-term implant survival, functional outcomes, and radiographic performance of cemented femoral stem (Beznoska s.r.o., Kladno, Czechia) in rTHA.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent rTHA with cemented stem between March 2012 and December 2023. The mean follow-up duration was 71.26(+/- 39.31) months. Implant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and failure modes were assessed. Radiographic changes were classified using the Gruen Zones system. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Cox proportional hazard models were applied to identify prognostic factors influencing implant survival.ResultsThe five-year implant survival rate was 98.1%, declining to 83.9% at twelve years. The overall failure rate was 3.83%, with periprosthetic infection (4 cases) being the most common cause, followed by aseptic loosening (2 cases). Radiographic changes were observed in 24.03% of cases, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Functional outcomes were favorable, with a mean HHS of 81.28(+/- 5.74), comparable to outcomes reported for uncemented revision stems. Age, stem diameter, and stem length did not significantly impact implant survival.ConclusionThe cemented stem demonstrated favourable long-term survival, with high implant retention rates. Functional outcomes indicated overall satisfactory performance. Radiographic evaluation revealed localized changes around the implant, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Implant failure was relatively rare, with periprosthetic infection being the most common cause.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-Term Survival of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Implants From Different Manufacturers
    Taylor, James W.
    Frampton, Chris
    Rothwell, Alastair G.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (02) : 491 - 495
  • [32] Is a Total Hip Arthroplasty Stem in Varus a Risk Factor of Long-Term Mechanical Complication?
    Montbarbon, Baptiste
    Letissier, Hoel
    Di Francia, Remi
    Stindel, Eric
    Dubrana, Frederic
    Williams, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (06) : 1104 - 1109
  • [33] Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Modular Femoral Stem in Middle-Aged Asian Patients
    Takahashi, Kaname
    Shimizu, Tomohiro
    Asano, Tsuyoshi
    Terkawi, Mohamad Alaa
    Iwasaki, Norimasa
    Takahashi, Daisuke
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (12) : 3650 - 3655
  • [34] Survivorship and Radiological Analysis of a Monoblock, Hydroxyapatite-Coated Titanium Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
    Saunders, Paul R. J.
    Shaw, Debbie A.
    Sidharthan, Sijin K.
    Siney, Paul D.
    Young, Stephen K.
    Board, Tim N.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06) : 1678 - 1685
  • [35] Modular Femoral Sleeve and Stem Implant Provides Long-term Total Hip Survivorship
    Le, David
    Smith, Karen
    Tanzer, Dylan
    Tanzer, Michael
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (02) : 508 - 513
  • [36] Which Functional Assessments Predict Long-term Wear After Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Takenaga, Ryan K.
    Callaghan, John J.
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    Liu, Steve S.
    Gao, Yubo
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (08) : 2586 - 2594
  • [37] Mid-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Long Cementless Monobloc Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Chatelet, Jean-Christophe
    Ait-Si-Selmi, Tarik
    Machenaud, Alain
    Ramos-Pascual, Sonia
    Fessy, Michel-Henri
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (01) : 261 - 267
  • [38] A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip A population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
    Weiss, Rudiger J.
    Stark, Andre
    Karrholm, Johan
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2011, 82 (02) : 136 - 142
  • [39] Long-Term Trends in Hip Arthroplasty Use and Volume
    Cram, Peter
    Lu, Xin
    Callaghan, John J.
    Vaughan-Sarrazin, Mary S.
    Cai, Xueya
    Li, Yue
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (02) : 278 - 285
  • [40] Long-term impact of physical activity and sports participation on implant integrity in resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Levett, Jordan J.
    Alnasser, Abdulrhman
    Teoli, Anthony
    Martel, Simon
    Robbins, Shawn
    Huk, Olga L.
    Zukor, David J.
    Antoniou, John
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2025,