Unsuccessful research funding applications: a scoping review of causes and impacts on Australian researchers and research projects

被引:0
作者
Odeyemi, Olumide A. [1 ,2 ]
Parry, Yvonne [1 ,3 ]
Ullah, Shahid [4 ]
Sivertsen, Nina [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Res Div, Launceston, Australia
[3] UCL, Integrated Community Child Hlth Policy & Practice, London, England
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Hlth Sci, Hammerfest, Norway
关键词
Research funding; Success rate; Unsuccessful research grants; Australian Research Council; National Health and Medical Research Council; GRANT APPLICATION; STRATEGIES; PROPOSALS;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-025-05330-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Research funding plays a significant role in achieving innovative development in health, education, and society. On average only 10-20% of research funding applications in Australia are successful. There is a paucity of studies on the causes and impacts of unsuccessful research funding applications on Australian researchers and research projects. A scoping review of primary studies and grey literature published between 1980 and 2022 from databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), OVID, and Google Scholar was conducted. Five studies published between 1992 and 2016 were identified, among which four focused on early career researchers and one focused on female academics. The main themes include causes of unsuccessful research funding applications and the impacts on research projects and Australian researchers. The causes of unsuccessful research funding applications include researchers' profiles, funding application processes, institutional support, and government involvement. The impacts of unsuccessful research funding applications on Australian researchers include job security, wasted time and effort, and discouragement. The impacts on research projects include abandonment, resubmission to the same or different funding body, and proceeding with the research project. There is a need for further studies on researchers' coping strategies and the institutional support available to researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:2799 / 2828
页数:30
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
ABS, 2021, RES EXPT DEV HIGHER
[2]   The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries [J].
Aldieri, Luigi ;
Kotsemir, Maxim ;
Vinci, Concetto Paolo .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2018, 62 :13-30
[3]  
ARC, 2020, PROMOTING IMPROVING
[4]  
ARC, 2024, SCHEME ROUND STAT AP
[5]   Mapping the progress and impacts of public health approaches to palliative care: a scoping review protocol [J].
Archibald, Daryll ;
Patterson, Rebecca ;
Haraldsdottir, Erna ;
Hazelwood, Mark ;
Fife, Shirley ;
Murray, Scott A. .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07)
[6]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[7]   Meta-research: justifying career disruption in funding applications, a survey of Australian researchers [J].
Barnett, Adrian ;
Page, Katie ;
Dyer, Carly ;
Cramb, Susanna .
ELIFE, 2022, 11
[8]  
Barnett Adrian G, 2017, Res Integr Peer Rev, V2, P16, DOI [10.1186/s41073-017-0040-0, 10.1186/s41073-017-0040-0]
[9]   Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study [J].
Barnett, Adrian G. ;
Herbert, Danielle L. ;
Campbell, Megan ;
Daly, Naomi ;
Roberts, Jason A. ;
Mudge, Alison ;
Graves, Nicholas .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
[10]   Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context? [J].
Bazeley, P .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 35 (04) :435-452