Exhaled breath analysis with the use of an electronic nose to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma: melaNose trial

被引:0
|
作者
van Dijk, Brigit [1 ]
Schoenaker, Ivonne J. H. [2 ]
van der Veldt, Astrid A. M. [1 ,3 ]
de Groot, Jan Willem B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Med Oncol, Med Ctr MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Isala, Isala Oncol Ctr, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Med Ctr MC, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2025年 / 16卷
关键词
melanoma; immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI); eNose; clinical benefit prediction; exhaled breath analysis; volatile organic compound (VOC); COMBINED NIVOLUMAB; LUNG-CANCER; IPILIMUMAB; BIOMARKERS; DIAGNOSIS; PATTERN;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1564463
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the overall survival for patients with different solid tumors. However, there is an urgent need for predictive biomarkers to identify patients with metastatic melanoma who do not benefit from treatment with ICIs, to prevent unnecessary immune related adverse events (irAEs). Electronic noses (eNoses) showed promising results in the detection of cancer as well as the prediction of response outcome in patients with cancer. In this feasibility study, we aimed to investigate whether the breath pattern measured using eNose can be used as a simple biomarker to predict clinical benefit to first-line treatment with ICIs in patients with metastatic melanoma.Methods In this prospective, observational single-center feasibility study, patients with metastatic melanoma performed a breath test using Aeonose (TM) before start of first-line treatment with ICIs. The detected exhaled breath pattern of volatile organic compounds (VOC) was used for machine learning in a training set to develop a model to identify patients who do not benefit from treatment with ICIs. Lack of clinical benefit was defined as progressive disease according to best tumor response using RECIST v1.1. Primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.Results The eNose showed a distinct breath pattern between patients with and without clinical benefit from ICIs. To identify patients who do not benefit from first-line ICIs treatment, breath pattern analysis using the eNose resulted in a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 79%, and accuracy of 85%.Conclusion Exhaled breath analysis using eNose can identify patients with metastatic melanoma who will not benefit from first-line treatment with ICIs and guide treatment strategies. When validated in an external cohort, eNose could be a useful tool to select these patients for alternative treatment strategies in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of immunosenescence on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients: a meta-analysis
    Li, Ping
    Yang, Xuefang
    Feng, Yumiao
    Wu, Lijuan
    Ma, Wei
    Ding, Gaozhong
    Wei, Yun
    Sun, Lan
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2018, 11 : 7521 - 7527
  • [42] An immunotherapy survivor population: health-related quality of life and toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
    O'Reilly, Aine
    Hughes, Peta
    Mann, Jasmine
    Lai, Zhuangming
    Teh, Jhia Jiat
    Mclean, Emma
    Edmonds, Kim
    Lingard, Karla
    Chauhan, Dharmisha
    Lynch, Joanna
    Au, Lewis
    Ludlow, Aileen
    Pattison, Natalie
    Wiseman, Theresa
    Turajlic, Samra
    Gore, Martin
    Larkin, James
    Husson, Olga
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (02) : 561 - 570
  • [43] NRAS tumor mutations are associated with reduced odds of dermatologic adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Chang, Michael S.
    Said, Jordan T.
    Akama-Garren, Elliot H.
    Trepanowski, Nicole
    Bui, Ai-Tram N.
    Giobbie-Hurder, Anita
    Leboeuf, Nicole R.
    Hartman, Rebecca I.
    JAAD INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 18 : 165 - 167
  • [44] Dual role of interferon-gamma in the response of melanoma patients to immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Wawrzyniak, Piotr
    Hartman, Mariusz L.
    MOLECULAR CANCER, 2025, 24 (01)
  • [45] Biomarkers, measured during therapy, for response of melanoma patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review
    Ouwerkerk, Wouter
    van den Berg, Mirjam
    van der Niet, Sanne
    Limpens, Jacqueline
    Luiten, Rosalie M.
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2019, 29 (05) : 453 - 464
  • [46] Genomic and Transcriptomic Predictors of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma Patients: A Machine Learning Approach
    Ahmed, Yaman B.
    Al-Bzour, Ayah N.
    Ababneh, Obada E.
    Abushukair, Hassan M.
    Saeed, Anwaar
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [47] Ceramide metabolism alterations contribute to Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced melanoma dedifferentiation and predict resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma patients
    Dufau, Carine
    Genais, Matthieu
    Mucher, Elodie
    Jung, Benjamin
    Garcia, Virginie
    Montfort, Anne
    Tosolini, Marie
    Clarke, Christopher J.
    Medin, Jeffrey A.
    Levade, Thierry
    Delord, Jean-Pierre
    Meyer, Nicolas
    Pancaldi, Vera
    Andrieu-Abadie, Nathalie
    Segui, Bruno
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [48] New Zealand national retrospective cohort study of survival outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors
    Ab Rahman, Ahmad Sufian
    Strother, Robert Matthew
    Paddison, Johanna
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 (01) : 179 - 186
  • [49] Dynamic peripheral blood immune cell markers for predicting the response of patients with metastatic cancer to immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Wei, Chen
    Wang, Mengyu
    Gao, Quanli
    Yuan, Shasha
    Deng, Wenying
    Bie, Liangyu
    Ma, Yijie
    Zhang, Chi
    Li, Shuyi
    Luo, Suxia
    Li, Ning
    CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2023, 72 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [50] Response and survival of metastatic melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibition for recurrent disease on adjuvant dendritic cell vaccination
    van Willigen, Wouter W.
    Bloemendal, Martine
    Boers-Sonderen, Marye J.
    de Groot, Jan Willem B.
    Koornstra, Rutger H. T.
    van der Veldt, Astrid A. M.
    Haanen, John B. A. G.
    Boudewijns, Steve
    Schreibelt, Gerty
    Gerritsen, Winald R.
    de Vries, I. Jolanda M.
    Bol, Kalijn F.
    ONCOIMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (01):