Evaluating the gather analyse summarize self-debriefing model in nursing students after simulation: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
作者
Belloni, Silvia [1 ]
Vangone, Ida [2 ,3 ]
Caruso, Rosario [4 ,5 ]
Magon, Arianna [4 ]
Conte, Gianluca [4 ]
Merlo, Maria Grazia [6 ]
Bascape, Barbara [7 ]
Arrigoni, Cristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Sect Hyg, Dept Publ Hlth Expt & Forens Med, Pavia, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Pavia, Ist Maugeri Ist Ricovero & Cura Carattere Sci, Nursing Degree Course, Pavia, Italy
[4] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Hlth Profess Res & Dev Unit, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Pavia, Fdn IRCCS Policlin San Matteo, Nursing Degree Course, Pavia, Italy
[7] Univ Pavia, Ist Clin Pavia & Vigevano, Nursing Degree Course, Pavia, Italy
关键词
Debriefing; Education; Experience; medium-fidelity simulation; Nursing; CRITICAL THINKING; HEALTH; STANDARDS; QUALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Debriefing is essential in simulation-based learning for nursing students, fostering critical thinking and clinical reasoning. The "Gather Analyze Summarize" (GAS) tool is a self-debriefing instrument, yet there is limited research on its effectiveness from the student perspective. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate first-year Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BScN) students' experiences with the GAS tool after simulation sessions. Methods: Data were collected cross-sectionally and through an electronic survey using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) to assess the GAS tool experience. Structural equation modelling was used to analyze the relationships between experience factors. Results: 151 nursing students were enrolled. The results indicated high satisfaction with the GAS. University satisfaction was a significant predictor of a positive experience with the GAS (Estimate = 0.45, p < 0.001), while age had a minor negative effect (Estimate = -0.18, p = 0.042). Conclusions: The GAS tool was positively perceived as an effective self-debriefing method in simulation practice, enhancing critical thinking. Enhancing the tool's reliability across other dimensions could improve overall student satisfaction and learning outcomes. (c) 2025 Organization for Associate Degree Nursing. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:e528 / e535
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Abulebda K., 2022, Debriefing Techniques Utilized in Medical Simulation
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ISO 9241-210:2019
[3]  
Benner P., 2008, PATIENT SAFETY QUALI
[4]   Integrating critical thinking strategies into nursing curricula [J].
Burrell, Lisa Anne .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2014, 9 (02) :53-58
[5]   Entry to practice nursing students' experiences of debriefing during clinical practice: A qualitative meta-synthesis* [J].
Cambridge, Prue ;
Brockenshire, Naomi ;
Bridge, Nicholas ;
Jarden, Rebecca J. .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2023, 128
[6]   A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education [J].
Chan, Zenobia C. Y. .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2013, 33 (03) :236-240
[7]  
Dattalo P., 2008, DETERMINING SAMPLE S
[8]   Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare [J].
Duff, Jonathan P. ;
Morse, Kate J. ;
Seelandt, Julia ;
Gross, Isabel T. ;
Lydston, Melis ;
Sargeant, Joan ;
Dieckmann, Peter ;
Allen, Joseph A. ;
Rudolph, Jenny W. ;
Kolbe, Michaela .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2024, 19 (1S) :S112-S121
[9]   The Influence of Nursing Simulation on Patient Outcomes and Patient Safety: A Scoping Review [J].
El Hussein, Mohamed Toufic ;
Harvey, Giuliana ;
Bell, Nicole .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2022, 70 :37-46
[10]   Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue [J].
Falco-Pegueroles, Anna ;
Rodriguez-Martin, Dolors ;
Ramos-Pozon, Sergio ;
Zuriguel-Perez, Esperanza .
NURSING PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 22 (01)