ESG Controversies and Firm Investment Efficiency: Impact and Mechanism Examination

被引:1
作者
Ma, Shijin [1 ]
Ma, Tao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Key Lab Policy Simulat & Assessment Ecol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
ESG controversies; investment efficiency; corporate governance; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; AGENCY THEORY; PERFORMANCE; CONTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.3390/risks13040067
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In the context of increasingly severe global climate change, both companies and investors are placing greater emphasis on investment philosophies centered around environmental protection, social responsibility, and corporate governance (ESG). This paper, based on data from 847 Chinese A-share listed companies over the period 2007-2022, employs a two-way fixed effects model to investigate the relationship between ESG controversies and firm investment efficiency. The results indicate that ESG controversies significantly reduce overall firm investment efficiency. Further analysis reveals that ESG controversies affect investment efficiency by exacerbating agency costs and reducing audit quality. Meanwhile, financing constraints and robust internal control quality mitigate these negative effects. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact is more pronounced for firms with higher pollution levels, non-state-owned enterprises, those with higher analyst coverage, and firms with lower levels of digitalization. The findings have significant implications for encouraging companies to fulfill their social responsibilities and promote high-quality economic development.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Employee ownership and corporate investment efficiency in Europe [J].
Adwan, Sami ;
Ahamed, M. Mostak .
REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2025, 64 (01) :191-236
[3]   Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data [J].
Aouadi A. ;
Marsat S. .
Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 (4) :1027-1047
[4]   Human Resource Practices for Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From Korean Firms [J].
Bang, Se-Rin ;
Choi, Myeong-Cheol ;
Ahn, Ji-Young .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
[5]   Is Corporate Tax Aggressiveness a Reputation Threat? Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Tax Behavior [J].
Baudot, Lisa ;
Johnson, Joseph A. ;
Roberts, Anna ;
Roberts, Robin W. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 163 (02) :197-215
[6]   Information Asymmetry in Management Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Opportunities [J].
Bergh, Donald D. ;
Ketchen, David J., Jr. ;
Orlandi, Ilaria ;
Heugens, Pursey P. M. A. R. ;
Boyd, Brian K. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 (01) :122-158
[7]   How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? [J].
Biddle, Gary C. ;
Hilary, Gilles ;
Verdi, Rodrigo S. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2009, 48 (2-3) :112-131
[8]   ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry [J].
Bilyay-Erdogan, Seda ;
Danisman, Gamze Ozturk ;
Demir, Ender .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2024, 91
[9]   How do ESG firms invest? [J].
Braun, Matias ;
Marcet, Francisco ;
Raddatz, Claudio .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 97
[10]   Corporate Governance, Internal Control and Logistics Enterprise Performance: Based on the Empirical Study of Listed Logistics Enterprises in China [J].
Cao, Li-Li ;
Deng, Jin-Bo ;
Liu, Li .
NTU MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 33 (01) :85-116