Making Circular Strategies Work: Advancing an Adaptable Building Framework through Action Design Research

被引:0
作者
Hamida, Mohammad B. [1 ]
Greco, Angela [1 ]
Remoy, Hilde [1 ]
Gruis, Vincent [1 ]
van Laar, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Management Built Environm, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Action research; Adaptability; Adaptive reuse; Built environment; Circular building adaptability; Design research; ADAPTIVE REUSE; CYCLES;
D O I
10.1007/s11213-025-09723-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Circular and adaptable strategies in building reuse are key to achieving a resource-efficient and future-proof built environment. Despite significant advances in circular building research, this field is affected by a significant theory-practice gap. To bridge this gap, we applied an action design research methodology, implementing a circular building design framework over a five-month period in the context of a Dutch monumental office building reuse. The objective of these interventions was to observe practitioners engaging with the framework and identify the barriers they encountered when considering and applying circular building strategies. We observed that the framework primarily functioned as a descriptive tool. Enhancing its usability and effectiveness required several refinements, including simplifying its self-description, clarifying its strategies through practical solutions and connections to related models, providing robust assessment tools, and improving its accessibility. Through iterative action research conducted during the observation and intervention period, we addressed these issues and advanced the framework. Our design-oriented approach led to the development of key design artifacts: a prescriptive guiding, assessment, and reporting tool; a stepwise approach to streamline application; and a hands-on worksheet for practitioners. These artifacts were integrated into a user-friendly platform, transforming the framework into a practical tool for real-world implementation. For theory, this study incorporates a circular perspective into a usable framework and demonstrates how an action design research approach can co-develop and improve frameworks and their usability and relevance. For practice, the produced artifacts represent boundary objects tailored to practitioners' needs; thereby paving the way for future circular adaptive reuse. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Characterisation of Adaptive Reuse Stakeholders and the Effectiveness of Collaborative Rationality Towards Building Resilient Urban Areas [J].
Aigwi, Itohan Esther ;
Phipps, Robyn ;
Ingham, Jason ;
Filippova, Olga .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2021, 34 (02) :141-151
[2]   Patterns for Living Lab Practice: Describing Key Know-How to Promote Service Co-Creation with Users [J].
Akasaka, Fumiya ;
Yasuoka, Mika ;
Nakatani, Momoko ;
Kimura, Atsunobu ;
Ihara, Masayuki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (05) :769-778
[3]   Application of circular economy principles in buildings: A systematic review [J].
Akhimien, Noah Gethsemane ;
Latif, Eshrar ;
Hou, Shan Shan .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 38 (38)
[4]  
Altrichter H., 2002, The Learning Organization, V9, P125, DOI [10.1108/09696470210428840, DOI 10.1108/09696470210428840]
[5]   An Action Research Study for Elaborating and Implementing an Electronic Waste Collection Program in Brazil [J].
Alves, Roberta ;
Alves Ferreira, Karen Lana ;
Lima, Renato da Silva ;
Ferreira Moraes, Flavia Tuane .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2021, 34 (01) :91-108
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive Europe
[7]  
Archer B, 1981, P DES RES SOC INT C
[8]   Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research [J].
Bayazit, N .
DESIGN ISSUES, 2004, 20 (01) :16-29
[9]  
Brand S., 1995, How buildings learn: What happens after they're built
[10]   Validating Action Research field studies: PEArL [J].
Champion, D ;
Stowell, FA .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2003, 16 (01) :21-36