Quality of life during the implementation of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery program compared to video-assisted thoracic surgery-a retrospective evaluation of 138 patients

被引:0
作者
Hoegerle, Benjamin A. [1 ]
Scheiner, Markus [1 ]
Pinter-Hoegerle, Anabel [2 ]
Schmidt, Werner [1 ]
Winter, Hauke [3 ,4 ]
Eichhorn, Martin E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Heidelberg, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Thoraxklin, Rontgenstr 1, D-69126 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Heidelberg, Dept Anesthesiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Med Fac Heidelberg, Dept Thorac Surg, Thoraxklin, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] German Ctr Lung Res DZL, Translat Lung Res Ctr TLRC, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY | 2025年 / 10卷
关键词
Quality of life (QoL); lung surgery; pain; robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS); implementation; OUTCOMES; PAIN;
D O I
10.21037/vats-24-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Postoperative quality of life (QoL) and pain are important factors to monitor and analyze when implementing a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. The aim of this study was to compare (I) the postoperative QoL and (II) the incidence of post-surgery pain during the RATS implementation program at our center. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated the RATS implementation period at our clinic between April 2018 and September 2019. The results recorded here were compared with the corresponding data of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in our clinic during the same period. All patients were included consecutively and all types of thoracic diseases were considered. Postoperatively, patients were asked to complete a 31-item questionnaire that included the 100-point QoL visual analogue scale (VAS), the QoL EQ-5D-3L index, and questions about individual pain perception. Furthermore, patient characteristics and perioperative details were collected. Results: In total, 138 patients who underwent minimally invasive resections were included in the study (VATS: 48%, RATS: 52%). RATS was mainly used for the resection of mediastinal tumors. Compared to VATS, patients complained of pain less frequently (P=0.07) and the pain was less severe (P=0.07) after RATS. RATS patients reported a higher VAS QoL (mean: 7.7 +/- 2.2) than VATS patients (6.9 +/- 2.0; P=0.04), and EQ-5D-3L QoL was higher in RATS patients (0.8 +/- 0.26) compared to VATS patients (0.71 +/- 0.24; P=0.06). A comparison of the EQ-5D-3L dimensions confirmed that RATS patients reported less pain (P=0.03) and improved mobility compared to VATS patients (P=0.01). Conclusions: In our center, the RATS program was implemented safely. In fact, patients had a higher QoL measured using the 100-point VAS and lower pain scores after RATS than after VATS.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Comparison of Quality of Life after Robotic, Video-Assisted, and Open Surgery for Lung Cancer
    Asemota, Nicole
    Maraschi, Alessandro
    Lampridis, Savvas
    Pilling, John
    King, Juliet
    Le Reun, Corinne
    Bille, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (19)
  • [2] Quality of life after anterior mediastinal mass resection: a prospective study comparing open with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic resection
    Balduyck, Bram
    Hendriks, Jeroen M.
    Lauwers, Patrick
    Mercelis, Rudy
    Ten Broecke, Pieter
    Van Schil, Paul
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 39 (04) : 543 - 548
  • [3] Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial
    Bendixen, Morten
    Jorgensen, Ole Dan
    Kronborg, Christian
    Andersen, Claus
    Licht, Peter Bjorn
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (06) : 836 - 844
  • [4] Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms
    Cerfolio, Robert J.
    Bryant, Ayesha S.
    Skylizard, Loki
    Minnich, Douglas James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 142 (04) : 740 - 746
  • [5] Prevalence and Predictors of Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chen, Wei-can
    Bai, Yu-yan
    Zhang, Li-hong
    Liu, Yi-bin
    Liu, Chu-yun
    Liang, Jin-wei
    He, He-fan
    [J]. PAIN AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (01) : 117 - 139
  • [6] Robotic thoracic surgery results in shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative pain compared to open thoracotomy: a matched pairs analysis
    Darr, Christopher
    Cheufou, Danjouma
    Weinreich, Gerhard
    Hachenberg, Thomas
    Aigner, Clemens
    Kampe, Sandra
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (10): : 4126 - 4130
  • [7] Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery: Learning Curve and Cost Analysis in a German High-Volume Centre
    Eichhorn, Martin
    Rotarmel, Andre
    Haag, Johannes
    Baum, Philip
    Winter, Hauke
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2023, 148 : S26 - S32
  • [8] Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
    Herdman, M.
    Gudex, C.
    Lloyd, A.
    Janssen, M. F.
    Kind, P.
    Parkin, D.
    Bonsel, G.
    Badia, X.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (10) : 1727 - 1736
  • [9] Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases
    Herrera, Luis
    Escalon, Juan
    Johnston, Matthew
    Sanchez, Alexis
    Sanchez, Renata
    Mogollon, Ivan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 405 - 411
  • [10] Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted vs video-assisted and traditional open thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Hu, Junjie
    Chen, Yan
    Dai, Jie
    Zhu, Xinsheng
    Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego
    Jiang, Gening
    Li, Hua
    Zhang, Peng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (05) : 1 - 14