The Community-Driven Ecosystem Resilience and Equity Framework: A Novel Approach for Social Resilience in Ecosystem Services

被引:1
作者
Shemshad, Masoomeh [1 ]
Synowiec, Agnieszka [1 ]
Kopyra, Marcin [2 ]
Benedek, Zsofia [3 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Krakow, Dept Agroecol & Plant Prod, Al Mickiewicza 21, PL-31120 Krakow, Poland
[2] Agr Univ Krakow, Dept Management & Econ Enterprises, Al Mickiewicza 21, PL-31120 Krakow, Poland
[3] HUN REN Ctr Econ, Reg Stud HUN REN CERS, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
land use; socio-ecological systems; agriculture; participatory governance; resilience; community-based ecosystem management; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; ADAPTATION; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.3390/su17083452
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecosystem service (ES) frameworks help to assess the benefits ecosystems provide to society, yet weak governance integration often limits their effectiveness. This review critically examines major ES frameworks' governance gaps, introduces the Community-Driven Ecosystem Resilience and Equity framework (C-DERM), and identifies five key gaps. Thematic coding is applied to achieve research objectives. The analysis of ten ecosystem service models shows that when considering the five socio-ecological elements of ES based on C-DERM-including community engagement and participatory governance, integration of cultural values and local knowledge, dynamic adaptive feedback mechanisms, social equity and inclusion, and social resilience and long-term sustainability-only the IAD-SES model achieves a strong score (3) in community engagement, while SES and IAD-SES moderately (2) integrate cultural values and address resilience; however, most models exhibit weak (1) or absent (0) consideration of social equity and participatory governance, highlighting a critical gap in inclusivity and community-driven approaches within existing frameworks. Finally, C-DERM enhances the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) framework by embedding social considerations into ES assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Adanma U.M., 2024, Financ. Account. Res. J., V6, P763
[2]  
Adger W.N., 2009, Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change
[3]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[4]   Social and ecological resilience: are they related? [J].
Adger, WN .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) :347-364
[5]  
Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
[6]  
Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
[7]   'just sustainability': the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain? [J].
Agyeman, J ;
Evans, B .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 170 :155-164
[8]  
Anderies JM, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
[9]   A conceptual framework linking ecosystem services, socio-ecological systems and socio-technical systems to understand the relational and spatial dynamics of the reduction of pesticide use in agrifood systems [J].
Angeon, Valerie ;
Casagrande, Marion ;
Navarrete, Mireille ;
Sabatier, Rodolphe .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 213
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis