Exploring the development path of bioenergy carbon capture and storage for achieving carbon neutrality in China: A systematic review

被引:0
作者
Yang, Lin [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Huiyun [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Haodong [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Guanqi [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Bang [5 ]
Li, Yiming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inner Mongolia Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hohhot 010021, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Univ, Inner Mongolia Inst Energy & Carbon Neutral Strate, Hohhot 010021, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Sci & Technol, Adm Ctr Chinas Agenda 21, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Univ Technol, Dept Environm & Chem Engn, Beijing Key Lab Green Catalysis & Separat, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CCUS; BECCS; Carbon neutrality; Development path; Biomass technologies; CO2 GEOLOGICAL STORAGE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; POWER-GENERATION; WATER RECOVERY; CCS TECHNOLOGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENERGY-CROPS; BIO-ENERGY; BIOMASS; BECCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2025.115685
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is essential for achieving carbon neutrality targets, whereas relevant demonstration projects have not yet been prioritized in China. This study attempts to investigate the development path of BECCS in China through mapping out a spatial and temporal development path considering practice advantages and underlying difficulties. It suggests that small-scale demonstration projects should be implemented before 2030 when biomass technologies should evolve from fuel substitution to material substitution. Between 2030 and 2040, large-scale biomass co-firing related BECCS projects can be deployed as a result of the maturation of biomass pretreatment technologies and second-generation capture technology, potentially leading to an emissions reduction of 80-100 Mt/a. In light of the challenges in source-sink matching, the early projects characterized with vertical integration and joint venture business models may be concentrated in the Northeast, North and East areas. Beyond 2040, advancements in combined fuel & material substitution and other integrated zero or negative carbon technologies are likely to facilitate pure biomass burning-related BECCS projects with emission reduction ranging from 300 to 600 Mt/a. By then, the flexible BECCS operator and transport operator business models can be promoted. Notably, if CO2 utilization technologies and offshore storage technologies are proven feasible, large-scale deployment can be achieved in the biomass-rich southwest and southeast Coastal areas. However, the northwest area may face restrictions due to limited scarce biomass resources. Additionally, intensive biomass collection mode, potential environmental damages (e.g. water consumption), global cooperation mechanism, etc. should also be highly regarded.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [1] ACCA21, 2019, Technology roadmap study on carbon capture. Utilization and storage in China
  • [2] Development of life cycle water-demand coefficients for coal-based power generation technologies
    Ali, Babkir
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 90 : 247 - 260
  • [3] Carbon dioxide removal potential from decentralised bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and the relevance of operational choices
    Almena, Alberto
    Thornley, Patricia
    Chong, Katie
    Roder, Mirjam
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2022, 159
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, Technology Roadmap. Carbon Capture and Storage in Industrial Applications
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, Energy Technology Perspectives 2017
  • [6] Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges
    Appels, Lise
    Lauwers, Joost
    Degreve, Jan
    Helsen, Lieve
    Lievens, Bart
    Willems, Kris
    Van Impe, Jan
    Dewil, Raf
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) : 4295 - 4301
  • [7] Meeting global temperature targets-the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
    Azar, Christian
    Johansson, Daniel J. A.
    Mattsson, Niclas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [8] Babiker M., 2023, CLIM CHANG 2014 IMP, P295
  • [9] Incentivising bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) responsibly: Comparing stakeholder policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Sweden
    Bellamy, Rob
    Fridahl, Mathias
    Lezaun, Javier
    Palmer, James
    Rodriguez, Emily
    Lefvert, Adrian
    Hansson, Anders
    Gronkvist, Stefan
    Haikola, Simon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 116 : 47 - 55
  • [10] Perceptions of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in different policy scenarios
    Bellamy, Rob
    Lezaun, Javier
    Palmer, James
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)