Tackling health inequalities: What exactly do we mean? Evidence from health policy in England

被引:1
作者
Checkland, Kath [1 ]
Bramwell, Donna [1 ]
Hammond, Jonathan [1 ]
Bailey, Simon [2 ]
Warwick-Giles, Lynsey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Div Populat Hlth, Manchester, England
[2] Univ Kent, Ctr Hlth Serv Studies, Canterbury, England
关键词
health inequalities; health policy; integrated care systems; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/13558196251334571
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To develop a model to support health systems in clarifying how they might target action to reduce health inequalities, and to use it to understand current policy on health inequalities in England.Methods We used the wider literature on the definitions of health inequalities to draw together a schematic model which attempts to link together the different conceptualisations of health inequalities present in the literature with potential sites of action that could be taken by local health systems. We then undertook a document analysis of the policy documents and programmes underlying the recent reorganisation of the NHS in England.Results The need to tackle health inequalities is cited as one of the main rationales underlying the changes. However, there is a lack of clarity within the documents around: the type of inequality being addressed; the identification of the group(s) suffering from inequalities; and the ways in which the assumed ameliorative mechanisms will work in practice. The documents place considerable emphasis on the assumption that closer partnership working will address inequalities, although the mechanisms by which this will be achieved are not specified and previous research demonstrates how difficult this can be.Conclusions The aspiration to tackle health inequalities through newly constituted Integrated Care Systems and Boards is welcome. However, it is well known that the contribution that health care services can make to addressing inequalities is relatively limited. Greater clarity is required of policy and local strategy if efforts are to be appropriately targeted.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Workforce predictive risk modelling: development of a model to identify general practices at risk of a supply-demand imbalance [J].
Abel, Gary A. ;
Gomez-Cano, Mayam ;
Mustafee, Navonil ;
Smart, Andi ;
Fletcher, Emily ;
Salisbury, Chris ;
Chilvers, Rupa ;
Dean, Sarah Gerard ;
Richards, Suzanne H. ;
Warren, F. ;
Campbell, John L. .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01)
[2]   We're Not All in This Together: On COVID-19, Intersectionality, and Structural Inequality [J].
Bowleg, Lisa .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (07) :917-917
[3]  
Bradford D., 2023, J Epidemiol Community Health, V77, pA53
[4]   NHS England statistics and long-term plan [J].
Burki, Talha Khan .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (02) :187-187
[5]   A Retrospective on Fundamental Cause Theory: State of the Literature and Goals for the Future [J].
Clouston, Sean A. P. ;
Link, Bruce G. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 47, 2021, 2021, 47 :131-156
[6]   Measuring inequalities in health: What do we know? What do we need to know? [J].
Costa-Font, Joan ;
Hernandez-Quevedo, Cristina .
HEALTH POLICY, 2012, 106 (02) :195-206
[7]  
Craig I., 2014, Best preventative investments for Scotland what the evidence and experts say
[8]  
Department of Health, 2021, Integration and innovation: working together to improve health and social care for all
[9]   Differential vulnerability and susceptibility: how to make use of recent development in our understanding of mediation and interaction to tackle health inequalities [J].
Diderichsen, Finn ;
Hallqvist, Johan ;
Whitehead, Margaret .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (01) :268-274
[10]   Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups [J].
Dixon-Woods M. ;
Cavers D. ;
Agarwal S. ;
Annandale E. ;
Arthur A. ;
Harvey J. ;
Hsu R. ;
Katbamna S. ;
Olsen R. ;
Smith L. ;
Riley R. ;
Sutton A.J. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)