Sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on the quality of postoperative recovery in elderly adults undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomised controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Yang, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Zeyang [1 ]
He, Xueqing [1 ]
Shen, Xiaoyun [1 ]
Jia, Wensen [1 ]
Sheng, Xinfang [1 ]
Yao, Xiangyu [1 ]
Jiao, Hao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Sch Anesthesiol, 209 Tongshan Rd, Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou 221002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Sugammadex; Neostigmine; Neuromuscular block; Postoperative recovery; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; Elderly adults; QoR-15; score; PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; DOUBLE-BLIND; READMISSION; PATIENT; CANCER; SCORE;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-025-03128-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Although neostigmine has been traditionally used for neuromuscular blockade reversal in thoracic surgery, incomplete reversal and potential pulmonary complications remain concerns. However, we did not preclude its clinical use. In contrast, sugammadex offers more predictable recovery of neuromuscular function with a superior safety profile. This study aims to compare the efficacy of sugammadex versus neostigmine in improving postoperative recovery outcomes. Methods This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients above 65 years old undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomly assigned to receive either sugammadex (2 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.04 mg/kg) with atropine for neuromuscular block reversal after T2 appearance on TOF. The primary outcome was the quality of recovery at postoperative day (POD) 1, assessed by the QoR-15 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included extubation time, PACU stay, incidence of hypoxaemia, PRNB, and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Results Data analysis included 77 patients (39 in Group S and 38 in Group N). The QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in the sugammadex group at day 1 (125 vs. 122, P < 0.001). Sugammadex significantly reduced extubation time (18 vs. 27.5 min, P = 0.001) and PACU stay (52 vs. 62 min, P = 0.001). Hypoxaemia (28% vs. 53%, P = 0.029) and PRNB (5% vs. 24%, P = 0.020) were less frequent in the sugammadex group. The sugammadex group had fewer PPCs, the difference was not statistically significant (26% vs. 45%, P = 0.079). Conclusions For elderly patients receiving VATS lobectomy, sugammadex is beneficial for acute recovery except PONV up to POD1 recovery quality mainly in ease of breath, eating, resting but not in postoperative outcomes over one month. Trial registration Retrospectively registered, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400089863(Date:18/09/2024).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) [J].
Batchelor, Timothy J. P. ;
Rasburn, Neil J. ;
Abdelnour-Berchtold, Etienne ;
Brunelli, Alessandro ;
Cerfolio, Robert J. ;
Gonzalez, Michel ;
Ljungqvist, Olle ;
Petersen, Rene H. ;
Popescu, Wanda M. ;
Slinger, Peter D. ;
Naidu, Babu .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 55 (01) :91-115
[2]   Does reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex reduce readmission rate after surgery? [J].
Bose, Somnath ;
Xu, Xinling ;
Eikermann, Matthias .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 122 (03) :294-298
[3]   Profile of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in the elderly: current perspectives [J].
Carron, Michele ;
Bertoncello, Francesco ;
Ieppariello, Giovanna .
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2018, 13 :13-24
[4]   Efficacy and safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Carron, Michele ;
Zarantonello, Francesco ;
Tellaroli, Paola ;
Ori, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2016, 35 :1-12
[5]   Sugammadex Allows Fast-Track Bariatric Surgery [J].
Carron, Michele ;
Veronese, Stefano ;
Foletto, Mirto ;
Ori, Carlo .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2013, 23 (10) :1558-1563
[6]  
Casanova J, 2017, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V67, P288, DOI [10.1016/j.bjane.2015.12.002, 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.02.005]
[7]   Recovery from Anesthesia after Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Two Different Reversals of Neuromuscular Blockade [J].
Claroni, Claudia ;
Covotta, Marco ;
Torregiani, Giulia ;
Marcelli, Maria Elena ;
Tuderti, Gabriele ;
Simone, Giuseppe ;
di Uccio, Alessandra Scotto ;
Zinilli, Antonio ;
Forastiere, Ester .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (11)
[8]   Sugammadex Reduces PACU Recovery Time after Abdominal Surgery Compared with Neostigmine [J].
Deng, Jin ;
Balouch, Maha ;
Albrink, Michael ;
Camporesi, Enrico M. .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 114 (10) :644-648
[9]  
Esteves Simao, 2023, Porto Biomed J, V8, pe225, DOI 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000225
[10]   Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for primary non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of outcome from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeon databaseaEuro [J].
Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel ;
Puyraveau, Marc ;
Thomas, Pascal-Alexandre ;
Decaluwe, Herbert ;
Huertgen, Martin ;
Petersen, Rene Horsleben ;
Hansen, Henrik ;
Brunelli, Alessandro .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 49 (02) :602-609