Influencing Factors on Learning from Incidents in Construction Project-Based Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review Approach

被引:0
作者
Lin, Lingna [1 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
learning from incidents; organizational system factors; construction industry; PRISMA; systematic literature review; Knowledge Management; SAFETY INCIDENTS; ACCIDENTS; LESSONS; EVENTS; CHALLENGES; FAILURE; CULTURE; MODEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.1080/10429247.2025.2485683
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Learning from incidents (LFI) has been widely concerned and produced rich results in high-risk organizations for decades, but is relatively fragmented in construction field. The study aimed to identify the influencing factors on contextual, managerial, and environmental elements of LFI in the construction field. A systematic literature review (SLR) study by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines has determined 30 papers during the period of 2000-2023 on LFI in construction field from 12 countries. Four core topics have been formed; learning input, learning process, learning participant and learning context and produced 14 sub-topics. The study found that learning context has the greatest impact on the formation of LFI (26 papers, 86.7%), followed by learning participant (25 papers, 83.3%), learning process (23 papers, 76.7%) and learning input (15 papers, 50%). Moreover, short of effectual LFI system is the most obstructive element, whereafter organizational bullying, and participants' beliefs (e.g. unsafe behavior of workers causing most accidents). A systematic literature review study could promisingly enhance construction project-based organizations such as owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers, supervisors and regulators in offering better comprehending on LFI to decrease construction accidents in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
[61]   Exploring feedback incidents, their characteristics and the informal learning activities that emanate from them [J].
Mulder, Regina H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 37 (01) :49-+
[62]   Adaptation to creation: Progress of organizational learning and increasing complexity of learning systems [J].
Nair, KU .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2001, 18 (06) :505-521
[63]   The mutual interdependences between safety and operations: A systematic literature review [J].
Neri, Alessandra ;
Cagno, Enrico ;
Paredi, Samuele .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 153
[64]   Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria [J].
Nowell, Lorelli S. ;
Norris, Jill M. ;
White, Deborah E. ;
Moules, Nancy J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2017, 16 (01)
[65]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1136/bmj.n71]
[66]   Understanding the challenges of immersive technology use in the architecture and construction industry: A systematic review [J].
Prabhakaran, Abhinesh ;
Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed ;
Mahdjoubi, Lamine .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 137
[67]   Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review [J].
Ramirez, Maria-Soledad ;
Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco-Jose .
COMUNICAR, 2018, 26 (54) :9-18
[68]   Lessons Learned from Lessons Learned [J].
Rhodes, Lucy ;
Dawson, Ray .
KNOWLEDGE AND PROCESS MANAGEMENT, 2013, 20 (03) :154-160
[69]   Work debate spaces: A tool for developing a participatory safety management [J].
Rocha, Raoni ;
Mollo, Vanina ;
Daniellou, Francois .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2015, 46 :107-114
[70]   Exploratory Analysis of Human-, Organizational-, and Project-Based Reworks: Challenges and Strategies [J].
Safapour, Elnaz ;
Kermanshachi, Sharareh ;
Taneja, Piyush ;
Pamidimukkala, Apurva .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 14 (01)