Influencing Factors on Learning from Incidents in Construction Project-Based Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review Approach

被引:0
作者
Lin, Lingna [1 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
learning from incidents; organizational system factors; construction industry; PRISMA; systematic literature review; Knowledge Management; SAFETY INCIDENTS; ACCIDENTS; LESSONS; EVENTS; CHALLENGES; FAILURE; CULTURE; MODEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.1080/10429247.2025.2485683
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Learning from incidents (LFI) has been widely concerned and produced rich results in high-risk organizations for decades, but is relatively fragmented in construction field. The study aimed to identify the influencing factors on contextual, managerial, and environmental elements of LFI in the construction field. A systematic literature review (SLR) study by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines has determined 30 papers during the period of 2000-2023 on LFI in construction field from 12 countries. Four core topics have been formed; learning input, learning process, learning participant and learning context and produced 14 sub-topics. The study found that learning context has the greatest impact on the formation of LFI (26 papers, 86.7%), followed by learning participant (25 papers, 83.3%), learning process (23 papers, 76.7%) and learning input (15 papers, 50%). Moreover, short of effectual LFI system is the most obstructive element, whereafter organizational bullying, and participants' beliefs (e.g. unsafe behavior of workers causing most accidents). A systematic literature review study could promisingly enhance construction project-based organizations such as owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers, supervisors and regulators in offering better comprehending on LFI to decrease construction accidents in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
[31]   Learning from failures: Accidents of marine structures on Norwegian continental shelf over 40 years time period [J].
Ibrion, Michaela ;
Paltrinieri, Nicola ;
Nejad, Amir R. .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2020, 111
[32]   Underlying causes and level of learning from accidents reported to the MARS database [J].
Jacobsson, Anders ;
Sales, Jaime ;
Mushtaq, Fesil .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2010, 23 (01) :39-45
[33]   Advancing the circular economy through information sharing: A systematic literature review [J].
Jager-Roschko, Moritz ;
Petersen, Moritz .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 369
[34]  
Johnson C.W., 2003, Failure in safety-critical systems: A handbook of accident and incident reporting
[35]   Accidents:: A discrepancy between indicators and facts! [J].
Korvers, P. M. W. ;
Sonnemans, P. J. M. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (07) :1067-1077
[36]  
Kovacova M., 2019, Transportation Research Procedia, V43, P104, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2019.12.024, 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.12.024]
[37]  
Kucharska Wioleta, 2021, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, P105
[38]   Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning [J].
Lampel, Joseph ;
Shamsie, Jamal ;
Shapira, Zur .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (05) :835-845
[39]   What have we learned about learning from accidents? Post-disasters reflections [J].
Le Coze, Jean Christophe .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 51 (01) :441-453
[40]   Developing a Tool to Measure and Compare Organizations' Resilience [J].
Lee, Amy V. ;
Vargo, John ;
Seville, Erica .
NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2013, 14 (01) :29-41