Management of cervical cerclage after preterm premature rupture of membranes: an argument for removal

被引:0
作者
Zullo, Fabrizio [1 ]
Mascio, Daniele Di [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth & Urol Sci, Rome, Italy
关键词
cerclage; chorioamnionitis; endometritis; infection; maternal sepsis; neonatal intensive care unit; neonatal sepsis; preterm birth; removal; CONTROLLED TRIAL; HIGH-RISK; WOMEN; CHORIOAMNIONITIS; PREVENTION; LENGTH; BIRTH; PROGESTERONE; PREDICTION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101570
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Cervical cerclage is a widely used intervention to prevent preterm birth in high-risk pregnancies. However, cerclage is associate with risks, including preterm premature rupture of membranes and subsequent complications, such as chorioamnionitis. Our review evaluates the evidence for immediate removal (ie, removal at the time of diagnosis) vs retention of cervical cerclage (ie, removal when clinically indicated) after preterm premature rupture of membranes, focusing on optimizing neonatal outcomes and minimizing maternal and fetal complications. A meta-analysis on the topic that included 169 patients in the "removal" group and 208 in the "retention" group showed that the rates of pregnancy prolongation >48 hours and >7 days were significantly lower in the group who underwent immediate removal of cerclage than in the group who had delayed removal of cerclage (pregnancy prolongation >48 hours: 47% vs 85%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.15; pregnancy prolongation >7 days: 33% vs 57%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.30). In addition, pregnancy latency was significantly lower, despite the absolute mean difference being only 2.84 days. However, the rates of chorioamnionitis and Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes were significantly lower in the immediate removal group than in the retention group (chorioamnionitis: 29% vs 41%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.57; Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes: 16% vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.22). A proposed balanced approach involves retaining the cerclage for approximately 24 hours after premature rupture of membranes (PROM) to permit steroid administration (initial dose followed by a second dose after 24 hours) before removal. This strategy aims to maximize steroid benefits while minimizing the risks of prolonged cerclage retention, potentially achieving a correct timing that optimizes neonatal outcomes without significantly increasing complications This management approach could be beneficial in situations where immediate removal may preclude full steroid benefits. Our recommendations support a protocol balancing appropriate timing for steroid administration with the risks of extended cerclage retention, namely, chorioamnionitis, unless further randomized controlled trials will show the proper evidence-based management in this clinical scenario.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Randomized trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in singleton women without lower genital tract inflammation [J].
Otsuki, Katsufumi ;
Nakai, Akihito ;
Matsuda, Yoshio ;
Shinozuka, Norio ;
Kawabata, Ikuno ;
Makino, Yasuo ;
Kamei, Yoshimasa ;
Iwashita, Mitsutoshi ;
Okai, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (02) :148-157
[22]   Can shortened midtrimester cervical length predict very early spontaneous preterm birth? [J].
Owen, J ;
Yost, N ;
Berghella, V ;
MacPherson, C ;
Swain, M ;
Dildy, GA ;
Miodovnik, M ;
Langer, O ;
Sibai, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (01) :298-303
[23]   Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth [J].
Owen, J ;
Yost, N ;
Berghella, V ;
Thom, E ;
Swain, M ;
Dildy, GA ;
Miodovnik, M ;
Langer, O ;
Sibai, B ;
McNellis, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (11) :1340-1348
[24]   The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units cesarean registry: Chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes [J].
Rouse, DJ ;
Landon, M ;
Leveno, KJ ;
Leindecker, S ;
Varner, MW ;
Caritis, SN ;
O'Sullivan, MJ ;
Wapner, RJ ;
Meis, PJ ;
Miodovnik, M ;
Sorokin, Y ;
Moawad, AH ;
Mabie, W ;
Conway, D ;
Gabbe, SG ;
Spong, CY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (01) :211-216
[25]   A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CERVICAL CERCLAGE IN WOMEN AT HIGH-RISK OF SPONTANEOUS PRETERM DELIVERY [J].
RUSH, RW ;
ISAACS, S ;
MCPHERSON, K ;
JONES, L ;
CHALMERS, I ;
GRANT, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1984, 91 (08) :724-730
[26]   Chorioamnionitis and Cerebral Palsy A Meta-Analysis [J].
Shatrov, Jobe G. ;
Birch, Samuel C. M. ;
Lam, Lawrence T. ;
Quinlivan, Julie A. ;
McIntyre, Sarah ;
Mendz, George L. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (02) :387-392
[27]   Cervical Cerclage Green-top Guideline No. 75 [J].
Shennan, A. H. ;
Story, L. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (07) :1178-1210
[28]   FIGO good practice recommendations on cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth [J].
Shennan, Andrew ;
Story, Lisa ;
Jacobsson, Bo ;
Grobman, William A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 155 (01) :19-22
[29]   Cervical lacerations in planned versus labor cerclage removal: a systematic review [J].
Simonazzi, Giuliana ;
Curti, Alessandra ;
Bisulli, Maria ;
Seravalli, Viola ;
Saccone, Gabriele ;
Berghella, Vincenzo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 193 :19-22
[30]   Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study [J].
To, MS ;
Skentou, CA ;
Roystont, P ;
Yu, CKH ;
Nicolaides, KH .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 27 (04) :362-367