Proper care for the profoundly disabled depends on theology being recognized as queen of medical humanities

被引:0
作者
Camosy, Charles [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[2] St Josephs Seminary & Coll, Yonkers, NY 10704 USA
关键词
Theology; Bioethics; Disability; Moral status; Medical humanites; DEFENSE;
D O I
10.1007/s40592-025-00247-0
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the rise of the medical humanities in general in recent decades, theological bioethics-during a very similar period of time-was marginalized from many central bioethical discussions. This is problematic for a number of reasons. First, because theologians invented the discipline of bioethics and deserve a place at the table. Second, because the marginalization is often ideologically motivated. And third, because the vision of the human person that theologians bring to the table is essential for understanding the moral status of the proundly disabled.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [11] Lewis A., 2023, Neurology, V100, pe528, DOI [10.1212/WNL.0000000000207740, DOI 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207740]
  • [12] McKenny G., 2023, The Hastings Center Report
  • [13] In Defense of Irreligious Bioethics
    Murphy, Timothy F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (12) : 3 - 10
  • [14] Paul John., 1995, Evangelium Vitae
  • [15] Schneider S., 2021, The New York Times
  • [16] Spector M., 1999, The New Yorker
  • [17] Stahl RY., 2020, American Journal of Bioethics, V20, P1, DOI [10.1080/15265161.2020.1832611, DOI 10.1080/15265161.2020.1832611]
  • [18] Talar C. J. T., 2020, Church Life Journal
  • [19] Tham J., 2007, PhD dissertation
  • [20] THOMSON JJ, 1971, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V1, P47