Monitoring bank risk around the world using unsupervised learning

被引:0
作者
Mercadier, Mathieu [1 ]
Tarazi, Amine [2 ,3 ]
Armand, Paul [4 ]
Lardy, Jean-Pierre [5 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Limoges, LAPE, 5 Rue Felix Eboue, F-87031 Limoges, France
[3] Inst Univ France IUF, 1 Rue Descartes, F-75231 Paris 05, France
[4] Univ Limoges, UMR 7252, CNRS, XLIM, 123 Ave Albert Thomas, F-87060 Limoges, France
[5] JPLC SASU, 54 Ave Revolut, F-87060 Limoges, France
关键词
Risk analysis; Decision support tool; support Banking risks; Systemic risk; K-means; VALUE-AT-RISK; SYSTEMIC RISK; EXPECTED SHORTFALL; CAPITAL SHORTFALL; INSOLVENCY RISK; MARKET; IMPROVEMENT; EXPOSURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper provides a transparent and dynamic decision support tool that ranks clusters of listed banks worldwide by riskiness. It is designed to be flexible in updating and editing the values and quantities of banks, indicators, and clusters. For constructing this tool, a large set of stand-alone and systemic risk indicators are computed and reduced to fewer representative factors. These factors are set as features for an adjusted version of a nested k-means algorithm that handles missing data. This algorithm gathers banks per clusters of riskiness and ranks them. The results of the individual banks' multidimensional clustering are also aggregable per country and region, enabling the identification of areas of fragility. Empirically, we rank five clusters of 256 listed banks and compute 72 indicators, which are reduced to 12 components based on 10 main factors, over the 2004-2024 period. The findings emphasize the importance of giving special consideration to the ambiguous impact of banks' size on systemic risk measures.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 615
页数:26
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] On the coherence of expected shortfall
    Acerbi, C
    Tasche, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2002, 26 (07) : 1487 - 1503
  • [2] Capital Shortfall: A New Approach to Ranking and Regulating Systemic Risks
    Acharya, Viral
    Engle, Robert
    Richardson, Matthew
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (03) : 59 - 64
  • [3] Measuring Systemic Risk
    Acharya, Viral V.
    Pedersen, Lasse H.
    Philippon, Thomas
    Richardson, Matthew
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 30 (01) : 2 - 47
  • [4] CoVaR
    Adrian, Tobias
    Brunnermeier, Markus K.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (07) : 1705 - 1741
  • [5] Do banks change their liquidity ratios based on network characteristics?
    Ardekani, Aref Mahdavi
    Distinguin, Isabelle
    Tarazi, Amine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (02) : 789 - 803
  • [6] The systemic importance of banks - name and shame seems to work
    Banbula, Piotr
    Iwanicz-Drozdowska, Malgorzata
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 18 : 297 - 301
  • [7] Assessing financial model risk
    Barrieu, Pauline
    Scandolo, Giacomo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 242 (02) : 546 - 556
  • [8] Barth J.R., 2017, FINANCIAL MARKETS I, V26, P175
  • [9] TOO BIG TO FAIL AND TOO BIG TO SAVE: DILEMMAS FOR BANKING REFORM
    Barth, James R.
    Wihlborg, Clas
    [J]. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 235 (01) : R27 - R39
  • [10] Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
    Bengio, Yoshua
    Courville, Aaron
    Vincent, Pascal
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (08) : 1798 - 1828