Validation of the Revised American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument 3.0

被引:0
|
作者
Campbell, Derrick F. [1 ]
Alameri, Mansoor [1 ]
Macahilig-Rice, Felicity [1 ,2 ]
Witkin, Sean E. [1 ,2 ]
Hellman, Nancy G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Augustine Hlth Sci, Coll Rehabil Sci, Phys Therapy Program, Austin, TX 78739 USA
[2] Univ St Augustine Hlth Sci, Coll Rehabil Sci, Phys Therapy Program, San Marcos, CA 92069 USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2025年 / 105卷 / 04期
关键词
Clinical Instructor (CI); Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI); Physical Therapy; Student; Validity;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzaf015
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Validation of the revised American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PT CPI 3.0) is essential to ensure that we are effectively assessing Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students' clinical performance. The purpose was to validate the revised PT CPI 3.0 for use with DPT students as a measure of clinical performance.Methods A descriptive and exploratory combined cross-sectional retrospective and prospective cohort design was used. University DPT students' clinical education experiences were explored. Participants were selected using a convenience sample of 693 DPT students from 1 US multicampus DPT program(s) during Fall 2023 and Spring 2024 clinical education experiences. DPT students on (1) integrated (ICE) and (2) 2 terminal clinical education experiences (TCE I and TCE II) participated in the study. Clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students at midterm and final assessments during clinical education experiences were investigated. Descriptive and inferential statistics evaluated differences between clinical instructor PT CPI 3.0 item ratings of DPT students during clinical education experiences.Results The PT CPI 3.0 demonstrated good internal reliability, and factor analysis with a 1-factor solution explained 81.3% of variance. Construct validity was supported by significant differences in PT CPI item scores between DPT students on ICE and each of TCE I and TCE II. Construct and convergent validity were supported by significant score increases from midterm to final assessments for DPT students on ICE and TCEs and by moderate to large correlations between prior clinical experiences and remaining didactic coursework.Conclusion Findings support validity of the revised PT CPI 3.0 as a measure of clinical performance. A limitation is that this study did not assess rater reliability.Impact This study provides preliminary support for validation of the newly revised APTA PT CPI 3.0 as a measure to assess entry-level physical therapist student clinical performance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical Therapist Management of Glenohumeral Joint Osteoarthritis: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Physical Therapy Association
    Michener, Lori A.
    Heitzman, Jill
    Abbruzzese, Laurel D.
    Bondoc, Salvador L.
    Bowne, Kristin
    Henning, Phillip Troy
    Kosakowski, Heidi
    Leggin, Brian G.
    Lucado, Ann M.
    Seitz, Amee L.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 103 (06):
  • [2] Telerehabilitation in Physical Therapist Practice: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Physical Therapy Association
    Lee, Alan C.
    Deutsch, Judith E.
    Holdsworth, Lesley
    Kaplan, Sandra L.
    Kosakowski, Heidi
    Latz, Robert
    Mcneary, Lydia Lennox
    O'Neil, Jennifer
    Ronzio, Oscar
    Sanders, Kelly
    Sigmund-Gaines, Michelle
    Wiley, Michele
    Russell, Trevor
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 104 (05):
  • [3] Research Agenda for Physical Therapy From the American Physical Therapy Association
    Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer
    Hicks, Gregory E.
    Zimney, Kory
    Slaven, Emily J.
    Manal, Tara Jo
    Jeffries, Lynn M.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 103 (10):
  • [4] Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: Instrument validation
    Beattie, PF
    Pinto, MB
    Nelson, MK
    Nelson, R
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (06): : 557 - 565
  • [5] Development and validation of an instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy
    Mendonca, K. M. P. P.
    Guerra, R. O.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 11 (05) : 369 - 376
  • [6] Predictors of Clinical Reasoning Using the Reasoning 4 Change Instrument With Physical Therapist Students
    Elven, Maria
    Hochwalder, Jacek
    Dean, Elizabeth
    Soderlund, Anne
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 99 (08): : 964 - 976
  • [7] Physical Therapy Management of Congenital Muscular Torticollis: A 2024 Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Physical Therapy Association Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy
    Sargent, Barbara
    Coulter, Colleen
    Cannoy, Jill
    Kaplan, Sandra L.
    PEDIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2024, 36 (04) : 370 - 421
  • [8] The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy
    Goldstein, MS
    Elliott, SD
    Guccione, AA
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2000, 80 (09): : 853 - 863
  • [9] Assessing clinical reasoning in physical therapy: discriminative validity of the Reasoning 4 Change instrument
    Elven, Maria
    Boersma, Katja
    Overmeer, Thomas
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2022, 117 : 8 - 15
  • [10] Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth
    Weston, AT
    Petosa, R
    Pate, RR
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1997, 29 (01) : 138 - 143