Parametric evaluation of 3D-printed polylactic acid scaffolds: Balancing mechanical and biological performance for bone tissue engineering

被引:0
作者
Akbari, Sadaf [1 ,2 ]
Khazaeinejad, Payam [1 ]
机构
[1] Kingston Univ, Sch Engn, London SW15 3DW, England
[2] Kingston Univ, Sch Life Sci Pharm & Chem, Kingston Upon Thames KT1 2EE, England
关键词
Bone tissue scaffolds; Finite element analysis; Polylactic acid; 3D printing; Porous tissue scaffolds; OF-THE-ART; FINITE-ELEMENT; POROSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104687
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study presents a novel approach to evaluating how individual design parameters affect the mechanical and biological performance of 3D-printed polylactic acid cylindrical bone tissue scaffolds. By systematically varying one parameter at a time (strand thickness, pore size, porosity, or orientation), their individual impacts are precisely assessed. Mechanical properties are incorporated into finite element analysis simulations that mimic femoral loading conditions. Results indicate that scaffolds with a 45 degrees orientation and the smallest strand thickness exhibit the highest deformation, while those with a 60 degrees orientation and the thickest strands show the lowest deformation. Moreover, the highest stress was observed in geometries with 45 degrees orientation, and those with 90 degrees had the lowest stress levels. These results suggest that geometries with 60 degrees and 90 degrees angle provide the sturdiest constructs for load bearing applications in bone tissue engineering. These findings are validated through experimental compression tests. Among the 36 proposed geometries, seven scaffolds display equivalent stress values within the acceptable range for cortical bone compressive strength. The optimized designs align mechanical properties with natural bone, potentially mitigating issues like osteopenia and stress shielding associated with stiffer implants. Contrary to prior recommendations for high porosity (>70%), proposed designs with 40-57% porosity can satisfy both mechanical and biological requirements, suggesting that lower-porosity scaffolds can achieve cellular proliferation rates comparable to those with higher porosity, as supported by existing studies. Future research will include biological tests to validate the biocompatibility of these optimized scaffolds.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [21] HULBERT S F, 1970, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, V4, P433, DOI 10.1002/jbm.820040309
  • [22] Biomaterials, Current Strategies, and Novel Nano-Technological Approaches for Periodontal Regeneration
    Iviglia, Giorgio
    Kargozar, Saeid
    Baino, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2019, 10 (01)
  • [23] Jahir-Hussain M. J., 2021, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V1051, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012016
  • [24] Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
    Karageorgiou, V
    Kaplan, D
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2005, 26 (27) : 5474 - 5491
  • [25] Fabrication of precise cylindrical three-dimensional tissue engineering scaffolds for in vitro and in vivo bone engineering applications
    Karp, JM
    Rzeszutek, K
    Shoichet, MS
    Davies, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 14 (03) : 317 - 323
  • [26] Kim T., 2020, Eng. Regen., V1
  • [27] Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Function of Multi-Material Hierarchically Structured Scaffolds
    Koushik, Tejas M.
    Miller, Catherine M.
    Antunes, Elsa
    [J]. ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [28] Kundu J., 2014, Rapid Prototyping of Biomaterials
  • [29] Lee S., 2022, Matter, V5
  • [30] Building a better bone: The synergy of 2D nanomaterials and 3D printing for bone tissue engineering
    Li, Na
    Cui, Junkui
    Chi, Minghan
    Thieringer, Florian M.
    Sharma, Neha
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2023, 234