What Can We Learn About Carbon-reducing Innovations From the Joint Dynamics of CO2 Emissions and GDP?

被引:0
作者
Jo, Soojin [1 ]
Karnizova, Lilia [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Econ, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Econ, 9053-120 Univ Private, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
关键词
CO2; emissions; carbon-reducing innovations; energy efficiency; sign restrictions; STRUCTURAL VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIONS; ENERGY-EFFICIENCY STANDARDS; SIGN RESTRICTIONS; MONETARY-POLICY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HYPOTHESIS; APPLIANCE; SHOCKS; PUTTY; PRICE;
D O I
10.1177/01956574251322722
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Technological innovations targeting energy efficiency, carbon storage, and clean energy are often promoted as solutions to reduce emissions without sacrificing economic growth. However, theoretical studies offer conflicting views on the feasibility of this approach, and empirical assessments at the aggregate level are sparse. This paper contributes new evidence on the macroeconomic implications of carbon-reducing technological innovations. We analyze the joint dynamics of U.S. per capita emissions and GDP and identify a novel shock that lowers emissions without reducing economic output. This statistical shock is uncorrelated with past macroeconomic variables, energy prices, estimates of the leading macroeconomic shocks, and measures of environmental policy stringency. Our novel shock exhibits characteristics of an energy demand-reducing shock specific to the U.S. energy market, with pronounced effects concentrated in the residential and commercial sectors. This shock appears to be linked to improvements in energy efficiency, possibly stemming from changes in energy requirements for homes and buildings. These improvements may result from energy policies, occur exogenously, or reflect shifts in preferences for energy conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does a Carbon Tax Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from British Columbia
    Pretis, Felix
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 83 (01) : 115 - 144
  • [42] Analyzing the impact of urbanization quality on CO2 emissions: What can geographically weighted regression tell us?
    Wang, Yanan
    Li, Xinbei
    Kang, Yanqing
    Chen, Wei
    Zhao, Minjuan
    Li, Wei
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 104 : 127 - 136
  • [43] Reducing CO2 Emissions from US Steel Consumption by 70% by 2050
    Ryan, Nicole A.
    Miller, Shelie A.
    Skerlos, Steven J.
    Cooper, Daniel R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (22) : 14598 - 14608
  • [44] Limnological dynamics of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from a tropical hypertrophic reservoir lake
    Gerardo-Nieto, Oscar
    Merino-Ibarra, Martin
    Sanchez-Carrillo, Salvador
    Guzman-Arias, Andrea P.
    Castillo-Sandoval, Fermin S.
    Barjau-Aguilar, Mariel
    Valdespino-Castillo, Patricia M.
    Lestayo-Gonzalez, Julio A.
    Diaz-Valenzuela, Julio
    Ramirez-Zierold, Jorge Alberto
    Thalasso, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 15 (05) : 2364 - 2378
  • [45] CO2 Emissions and Income Dynamics: What Does the Global Evidence Tell Us?
    Thomas Bassetti
    Nikos Benos
    Stelios Karagiannis
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2013, 54 : 101 - 125
  • [46] Can EV (electric vehicles) address Ireland's CO2 emissions from transport?
    Smith, William J.
    ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) : 4514 - 4521
  • [48] Dynamic Carbon-Constrained EPEC Model for Strategic Generation Investment Incentives with the Aim of Reducing CO2 Emissions
    Valinejad, Jaber
    Marzband, Mousa
    Elsdon, Michael
    Saad Al-Sumaiti, Ameena
    Barforoushi, Taghi
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (24)
  • [49] Supercritical CO2/Ionic Liquid Systems: What Can We Extract from Infrared and Raman Spectra?
    Andanson, Jean-Michel
    Jutz, Fabian
    Baiker, Alfons
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2009, 113 (30) : 10249 - 10254
  • [50] Application of a system dynamics approach for assessment and mitigation of CO2 emissions from the cement industry
    Anand, Shalini
    Vrat, Prem
    Dahiya, R. P.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (04) : 383 - 398