Social and ecological factors on the perception of cultural ecosystem services and disservices: Insights from Shanghai, China

被引:0
|
作者
Su, Rongfei [1 ,3 ]
Ye, Shiyu [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Linlin [2 ]
Wu, Jingbin [2 ]
Kang, Yan [1 ]
Chen, Ruishan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Design, Dept Landscape Architecture, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Nat Conservancy TNC, Room 202,Bldg 6,103 Caobao Rd, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Nat Resources, Digital Engn Technol Innovat Ctr Terr Ecol Governa, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
上海市自然科学基金; 中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Urban green space; Community habitat garden; Cultural ecosystem services; Biodiversity conservation; Mixed methods; URBAN GREEN SPACE; LANDSCAPE; BIODIVERSITY; GARDENS; MANAGEMENT; VALUES; AESTHETICS; FRAMEWORK; URBANIZATION; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105373
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Urban habitat gardens, designed at the urban community scale, are increasingly recognized as vital components of urban green infrastructure, contributing to biodiversity conservation and enhancing urban resident well-being. Despite their growing implementation, comprehensive studies examining their delivery of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) in densely populated areas remain limited. Previous research has predominantly focused on ecological impacts while largely neglecting the social dimensions influencing CES perception and valuation. This study bridges this gap by conceptualizing the multiscale feedback framework linking cultural ecosystem services and urban socio-ecological drivers. Using a mixed-methods approach, we then testified the conceptual framework by a case study focusing on eight habitat gardens in Changning District, Shanghai city of China. Results indicate that recreational and aesthetic values were most highly rated, while inspiration received the lowest valuation. Approximately 30% of residents reported disservices including animal disturbances, safety concerns, and health issues. Both social factors (age, education, gender, employment), usage patterns (visit frequency, duration), and ecological characteristics (plant diversity, landscape connectivity) significantly influenced CES perceptions. The findings underscore the necessity of integrating ecological properties with community characteristics to optimize habitat gardens' efficacy in biodiversity conservation and CES delivery. We recommend holistic strategies that balance ecological and social sustainability in urban planning.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring the Perceived Heterogeneity of Cultural Ecosystem Services in National Cultural Parks: Evidence from China
    Huang, Wei
    Lu, Shizhu
    Guo, Yuqing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [42] Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services
    Musacchio, Laura R.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 1025 - 1038
  • [43] Exploring drivers of ecosystem services variation from a geospatial perspective: Insights from China's Shanxi Province
    Hu, Baoan
    Kang, Fengfeng
    Han, Hairong
    Cheng, Xiaoqin
    Li, Zuzheng
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 131
  • [44] A social-ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems
    Andersson, Erik
    Nykvist, Bjorn
    Malinga, Rebecka
    Jaramillo, Fernando
    Lindborg, Regina
    AMBIO, 2015, 44 : S102 - S112
  • [45] Spatial distribution of cultural ecosystem services demand and supply in urban and suburban areas: A case study from Shanghai, China
    Bing, Zhenhua
    Qiu, Yishu
    Huang, Heping
    Chen, Tingzhen
    Zhong, Wei
    Jiang, Hong
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 127
  • [46] Cool species in tedious landscapes: Ecosystem services and disservices affect nature-based recreation in cultural landscapes
    Brambilla M.
    Ronchi S.
    Ecological Indicators, 2020, 116
  • [47] Integrated Approach to Understanding Perceived Importance and Changes in Watershed Ecosystem Services (WESs): Insights from Central Nepal
    Dhungana, Nabin
    Lee, Chun-Hung
    Adhikari, Samjhana
    Rayamajhi, Bishal Kumar
    Aryal, Udit Chandra
    Ghimire, Pramod
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [48] Spatial distribution and influencing factors of rural cultural ecosystem services: a case study of Fujian, China
    Li, Congzhi
    Pan, Ying
    Yin, Weilun
    Lan, Siren
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [49] Insights into citizens' experiences of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces based on social media analytics
    Li, Jie
    Gao, Jun
    Zhang, Zhonghao
    Fu, Jing
    Shao, Guofan
    Zhao, Zhenyu
    Yang, Panpan
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 244
  • [50] The capacity of urban parks for providing regulating and cultural ecosystem services versus their social perception
    Stepniewska, Malgorzata
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111