Climate regulation's effects on businesses and public support for climate action

被引:0
作者
Menon, Anil [1 ]
Nissen, Katie [2 ]
Osgood, Iain [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Merced, Dept Polit Sci, Merced, CA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Polit Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
climate change; climate regulation; emissions; firms; public opinion; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; TRADE; PREFERENCES; INCREASE; BURDEN; FIRMS; BOX; CO2;
D O I
10.1017/psrm.2025.11
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
How do the effects of climate regulation on businesses impact public attitudes toward climate policy? While emissions intensity is the primary frame for understanding the effects of climate policy on business, theoretical scholarship and public discourse often emphasize that large firms will adjust to climate regulations easily while smaller firms will struggle. Because small businesses are sympathetic and large firms are unpopular, individuals who view climate regulation's effects in line with this firm size account should be less likely to support climate change mitigation. To test this theory, we conduct an original survey of climate policy beliefs and then a survey experiment. We find evidence that distaste for large corporations increases opposition to climate action among people exposed to the idea that big companies can more easily navigate climate regulations than small companies. This work contributes to the literature on moral political economy and on the enduring difficulty of enacting effective climate change regulation within the United States.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   Firms in Trade and Trade Politics [J].
Kim, In Song ;
Osgood, Iain .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 22, 2019, 22 :399-417
[32]   Electric utilities and American climate policy: lobbying by expected winners and losers [J].
Kim, Sung Eun ;
Urpelainen, Johannes ;
Yang, Joonseok .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 36 (02) :251-275
[33]   Burden or benefit? Regulation as a dynamic influence on small business performance [J].
Kitching, John ;
Hart, Mark ;
Wilson, Nick .
INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, 33 (02) :130-147
[34]   Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy? [J].
Kolcava, Dennis ;
Quynh Nguyen ;
Bernauer, Thomas .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 163 :98-112
[35]  
Kumar A, 2017, J STRATEGY MANAG, V10, P227, DOI 10.1108/JSMA-11-2015-0089
[36]  
Leiserowitz A., 2019, Majority of Americans Think Fossil Fuel Companies Are Responsible for the Damages Caused by Global Warming
[37]   Creating and Capturing Value: Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Resource-Based Theory, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage [J].
McWilliams, Abagail ;
Siegel, Donald S. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (05) :1480-1495
[38]   Oppose, Support, or Hedge? Distributional Effects, Regulatory Pressure, and Business Strategy in Environmental Politics [J].
Meckling, Jonas .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2015, 15 (02) :19-+
[39]   The Wrong Winners: Anti-Corporate Animus and Attitudes Towards Trade [J].
Menon, Anil ;
Osgood, Iain .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 54 (04) :1180-1197
[40]  
MICHAELIS P, 1994, J INST THEOR ECON, V150, P693