Climate regulation's effects on businesses and public support for climate action

被引:0
作者
Menon, Anil [1 ]
Nissen, Katie [2 ]
Osgood, Iain [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Merced, Dept Polit Sci, Merced, CA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Polit Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
climate change; climate regulation; emissions; firms; public opinion; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; TRADE; PREFERENCES; INCREASE; BURDEN; FIRMS; BOX; CO2;
D O I
10.1017/psrm.2025.11
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
How do the effects of climate regulation on businesses impact public attitudes toward climate policy? While emissions intensity is the primary frame for understanding the effects of climate policy on business, theoretical scholarship and public discourse often emphasize that large firms will adjust to climate regulations easily while smaller firms will struggle. Because small businesses are sympathetic and large firms are unpopular, individuals who view climate regulation's effects in line with this firm size account should be less likely to support climate change mitigation. To test this theory, we conduct an original survey of climate policy beliefs and then a survey experiment. We find evidence that distaste for large corporations increases opposition to climate action among people exposed to the idea that big companies can more easily navigate climate regulations than small companies. This work contributes to the literature on moral political economy and on the enduring difficulty of enacting effective climate change regulation within the United States.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Understanding environmental policy preferences: New evidence from Brazil [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Bayer, Patrick ;
Harish, S. P. ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 94 :28-36
[2]   The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy: A New Resource-Based View Perspective [J].
Backman, Charles A. ;
Verbeke, Alain ;
Schulz, Robert A. .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2017, 56 (04) :545-575
[3]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[4]   Beliefs About Consequences from Climate Action Under Weak Climate Institutions: Sectors, Home Bias, and International Embeddedness [J].
Bayer, Patrick ;
Genovese, Federica .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2020, 20 (04) :28-50
[5]   Interests, Norms and Support for the Provision of Global Public Goods: The Case of Climate Co-operation [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Genovese, Federica ;
Scheve, Kenneth F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 49 (04) :1333-1355
[6]   Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Scheve, Kenneth F. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (34) :13763-13768
[7]   The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade [J].
Bernard, Andrew B. ;
Jensen, J. Bradford ;
Redding, Stephen J. ;
Schott, Peter K. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 4, 2012, 4 :283-313
[8]   Following the money: trade associations, political activity and climate change [J].
Brulle, Robert ;
Downie, Christian .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2022, 175 (3-4)
[9]   Loads of green washing-can behavioural economics increase willingness-to-pay for efficient washing machines in the UK? [J].
Bull, Joe .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 50 :242-252
[10]   Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets [J].
Christmann, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :663-680