Anaerobic digestion of thermal hydrolysis pretreated sludge: Process performance, metagenomic analysis, techno-economic and life cycle assessment

被引:0
作者
Balasundaram, Gowtham [1 ]
Gahlot, Pallavi [1 ]
Hafyan, Rendra Hakim [2 ]
Tyagi, Vinay Kumar [3 ]
Gadkari, Siddharth [2 ]
Sahu, Ashish [4 ]
Barber, Bill [4 ]
Mutiyar, Pravin K. [5 ]
Kazmi, A. A. [1 ]
Kleiven, Harald [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Roorkee, Dept Civil Engn, Roorkee 247667, India
[2] Univ Surrey, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, England
[3] Natl Inst Hydrol, Environm Hydrol Div, Roorkee 247667, India
[4] Cambi AS, Skysstas 11A, N-1383 Asker, Norway
[5] Govt India, Minist Jal Shakti, Dept Water Resources, Natl Mission Clean Ganga, New Delhi, India
关键词
Methane; Energy analysis; Global warming; Methanogens; Payback period; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; ENERGY; WASTE; BIOGAS; BIOMETHANE; BALANCE; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132470
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study assessed the potential of thermal hydrolysis process (THP) combined with anaerobic digestion (AD) for high solids sewage sludge treatment across various hydraulic retention times (HRTs). Optimal performance was achieved at a 10-day HRT (6 kg VS/m3 & sdot;day), yielding 408 L CH4/kg VS added and 54 % volatile solids (VS) removal under THP conditions of 160 degrees C, 30 min, and 6 bar pressure. Microbial analysis revealed predominant acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Four scenarios were designed and analyzed for environmental and economic performance: Scenario 1 (conventional AD-CHP), Scenario 2 (conventional AD-BioCNG), Scenario 3 (THP AD-BioCNG), and Scenario 4 (THP AD-CHP). The results showed that scenarios with CHP integration achieved better environmental performance by generating sufficient energy to meet demand, with energy consumption as a key factor. Notably, scenario 4 had the lowest global warming potential (GWP) at -0.0185 kg CO2eq, outperforming conventional AD (Scenario 1) with CHP, which had a GWP of -0.00232 kg CO2-eq. However, profitability analysis showed that Scenario 3 was the most economically viable, with a net present value (NPV) of $4.3 million, an internal rate of return (IRR) of 10.21 %, and a 17-year payback period. Although it had higher capital ($58 million) and operational costs ($12.5 million/year) than Scenario 4 ($45 million and $8.6 million/ year), its greater biomethane yield resulted in higher revenue ($20.7 million/year), making it the most profitable option. While Scenario 4 offered the best environmental benefits, Scenario 3 emerged as the most financially sustainable choice. These findings highlight the environmental and economic advantage of utilizing THP-AD process over conventional AD, suggesting that THP-AD optimizes methane production, solids reduction, and environmental impact, making the Bio CNG pathway a sustainable and economically viable option.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Abu-Orf M., 2012, RES BIOS C 2012 WAT
[2]   Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of thermal and thermal-alkali processed organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Methane yield, energy analysis, anaerobic microbiome [J].
Ahmed, Banafsha ;
Gahlot, Pallavi ;
Balasundaram, Gowtham ;
Tyagi, Vinay Kumar ;
Banu, J. Rajesh ;
Vivekanand, Vivekanand ;
Kazmi, A. A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 345
[3]  
Apha, 2023, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, V24th
[4]   Process design and techno-economic analysis of an integrated mango processing waste biorefinery [J].
Arora, Amit ;
Banerjee, Jhumur ;
Vijayaraghavan, R. ;
MacFarlane, Douglas ;
Patti, Antonio F. .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2018, 116 :24-34
[5]   A critical review of pretreatment technologies to enhance anaerobic digestion and energy recovery [J].
Atelge, M. R. ;
Atabani, A. E. ;
Banu, J. Rajesh ;
Krisa, David ;
Kaya, M. ;
Eskicioglu, Cigdem ;
Kumar, Gopalakrishnan ;
Lee, Changsoo ;
Yildiz, Y. S. ;
Unalan, S. ;
Mohanasundaram, R. ;
Duman, F. .
FUEL, 2020, 270
[6]   Energy feasibility and life cycle assessment of sludge pretreatment methods for advanced anaerobic digestion [J].
Balasundaram, Gowtham ;
Vidyarthi, Praveen Kumar ;
Gahlot, Pallavi ;
Arora, Pratham ;
Kumar, Vinod ;
Kumar, Manish ;
Kazmi, A. A. ;
Tyagi, Vinay Kumar .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 357
[7]   Thermal hydrolysis for sewage treatment: A critical review [J].
Barber, W. P. F. .
WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 104 :53-71
[8]   From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context [J].
Barbera, Elena ;
Menegon, Silvia ;
Banzato, Donatella ;
D'Alpaos, Chiara ;
Bertucco, Alberto .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 135 :663-673
[9]   Impact of low-thermal pretreatment on physicochemical properties of saline waste activated sludge, hydrolysis of organics and methane yield in anaerobic digestion [J].
Biswal, Basanta Kumar ;
Huang, Hao ;
Dai, Ji ;
Chen, Guang-Hao ;
Wu, Di .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 297
[10]   Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: A review [J].
Cano, R. ;
Perez-Elvira, S. I. ;
Fdz-Polanco, F. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 149 :176-185