Communicating blood test results in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review

被引:1
作者
Nankervis, Helen [1 ]
Huntley, Alyson L. [1 ]
Whiting, Penny [1 ]
Hamilton, William [2 ]
Singh, Hardeep [3 ,4 ]
Dawson, Sarah [5 ]
O'Donnell, Rachel [5 ]
Sprackman, Jane [5 ]
Montague, Anna Ferguson [5 ]
Watson, Jessica [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Clin Epidemiol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Primary Care Diagnost, Exeter, England
[3] Michael DeBakey Vet Affairs Med Cente, Ctr Innovat Qual Effectiveness & Safety IQuESt, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
communication; haematologic tests; primary health care; systematic review; FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT PREFERENCES; HEALTH INFORMATION; PERSPECTIVES; MANAGEMENT; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2024.0338
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Online records access, including test results, was rolled out as part of changes to the GP contract in England in 2023. Blood test result communication is important for patient- centred care, patient safety, and primary care workload. Evidence is needed to ensure that test results are communicated safely and efficiently to patients in primary care. Aim To summarise existing evidence for blood test result communication between primary care providers and their patients and carers. Design and setting A mixed- methods systematic review was undertaken. Method MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2013- September 2023. Qualitative or quantitative studies that provided information on the communication of blood test results by primary care staff to adult patients and carers were eligible for inclusion. Results There were 71 included studies, including 10 experimental studies and no randomised controlled trials. Study quality was mostly poor and risk of bias was high, partly owing to a lack of reported information. The studies found that patients want more information about their blood test results, particularly in terms of 'what next', and prefer results to be provided quickly. Electronic methods, such as online access or text messages, were generally well accepted but not by everyone, and not for all results. Clinicians' opinions were mixed as to whether online direct release of test results to patients was beneficial or could cause problems, such as increased patient anxiety and increased workload. Conclusion A range of evidence has been identified on patient and clinician preferences, and barriers and facilitators to test communication, which is particularly important in the current NHS context of a move towards patient online access.
引用
收藏
页码:e222 / e231
页数:10
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Primary care research: does it defy definition? [J].
Amisi, James ;
Downing, Raymond .
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 18 (06) :523-526
[2]   Adult patient access to electronic health records [J].
Ammenwerth, Elske ;
Neyer, Stefanie ;
Hoerbst, Alexander ;
Mueller, Gerhard ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Schnell-Inderst, Petra .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, (02)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Summary of the Evidence on Patient Safety: Implications for Research
[4]   Numbers, graphs and words - do we really understand the lab test results accessible via the patient portals? [J].
Bar-Lev, Shirly ;
Beimel, Dizza .
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01)
[5]   Experiences and opinions of general practitioners with patient online record access: an online survey in England [J].
Blease, Charlotte R. ;
Kharko, Anna ;
Dong, Zhiyong ;
Jones, Ray B. ;
Davidge, Gail ;
Hagglund, Maria ;
Turner, Andrew ;
Desroches, Catherine ;
Mcmillan, Brian .
BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01)
[6]   The effectiveness of starting up a communications centre for sending mail or SMS with normal test results in primary healthcare [J].
Bonet J.M. ;
Hernández Ó. ;
Solans Ó. ;
Pérez M.J. ;
Barea C. ;
Garcia F. .
Health and Technology, 2018, 8 (1-2) :51-56
[7]   Laboratory test ordering and results management systems: a qualitative study of safety risks identified by administrators in general practice [J].
Bowie, Paul ;
Halley, Lyn ;
McKay, John .
BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (02)
[8]   Bayesian versus diagnostic information in physician-patient communication: Effects of direction of statistical information and presentation of visualization [J].
Brose, Sarah Frederike ;
Binder, Karin ;
Fischer, Martin R. ;
Reincke, Martin ;
Braun, Leah T. ;
Schmidmaier, Ralf .
PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06)
[9]   Informed or anxious: patient preferences for release of test results of increasing sensitivity on electronic patient portals [J].
Bruno, Bethany ;
Steele, Scott ;
Carbone, Justin ;
Schneider, Katherine ;
Posk, Lori ;
Rose, Susannah L. .
HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (01) :59-67
[10]   Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review [J].
Callen, Joanne L. ;
Westbrook, Johanna I. ;
Georgiou, Andrew ;
Li, Julie .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) :1334-1348