On digital cultural value: What does research tell us?

被引:0
作者
Hylland, Ole Marius [1 ]
Berge, Ola K. [1 ]
Haugsevje, Asne Dahl [1 ]
机构
[1] Telemark Res Inst, Bo, Norway
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Digitalization; cultural value; cultural policy; literature review; participation; production; WEB; 2.0; HERITAGE; DIVERSITY; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNICATION; ENGAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/09548963.2025.2495757
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The value of culture is both essential and contested within the field of cultural policy. It is essential because valuation serves a need to legitimate relevance of and explain the benefits of cultural participation. It is contested because the methods by which we might measure and analyse such value are epistemologically challenging. This paper investigates how the value of digital and digitized culture has been analysed by different strands of cultural research, prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. Through a systematic literature review, we find that the identified values belong to three different broad categories: Production, Access, and Participation. The review conducted in this paper shows that digitization has affected the configuration of the values of culture in different ways. It has brought an increased complexity to the valuation of culture, and the views and attributed values of digitized culture have also developed during two decades of cultural digitization. In general, we also find increasingly more critical views on the potential values of digitization in more contemporary research, especially in the categories of Access and Production.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Heritage-making 'from below': the politics of exhibiting architectural heritage on the Internet - a case study [J].
Aigner, Anita .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HERITAGE STUDIES, 2016, 22 (03) :181-199
[2]  
Albornoz L., 2019, Audiovisual industries and diversity: Economics and policies in the digital era
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Understanding the Value of Arts and Culture
[4]  
Arksey H., 2005, Int J Soc Res Methodol, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/136455]
[5]  
Bakhshi H, 2016, J CULT ECON, V40, P359, DOI 10.1007/s10824-015-9253-6
[6]   New technologies in cultural institutions: theory, evidence and policy implications [J].
Bakhshi, Hasan ;
Throsby, David .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CULTURAL POLICY, 2012, 18 (02) :205-222
[7]  
Becker Howard., 1984, Art Worlds
[8]  
Belfiore E., 2004, International Journal of Cultural Policy, V10, P183, DOI 10.1080/10286630042000255808
[9]  
Belfiore E, 2008, SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE ARTS: AN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230227774
[10]  
Belfiore E., 2002, International Journal of Cultural Policy, V8, P91, DOI [10.1080/102866302900324658, DOI 10.1080/102866302900324658]