Digital Staff Support Interventions for the Psychological Wellbeing of Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Vigneshwar Paleri [1 ]
Lucia Valmaggia [2 ]
Ina Kaleva [1 ]
Rebecca Martland [3 ]
Simon Riches [4 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London
[2] South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London
[3] Orygen, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
[4] Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven
[5] Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Burnout; eHealth; HealthTech; Mental Health; Stress; Technology;
D O I
10.1007/s41347-024-00434-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Healthcare professionals experience stressful events which impact on overall wellbeing. The rise of digital interventions marks an opportunity to support healthcare professionals in their psychological wellbeing. This systematic review aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of digital interventions for healthcare professionals in mental and physical healthcare to improve psychological wellbeing (PROSPERO CRD42023394966). Four electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science) were searched, from inception, until 10 June 2024. The review was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool was used to assess the methodological quality of studies. Thirty-five studies were included (N = 5364, published 2004–2024), including 13 randomised controlled trials. The majority of the studies were carried out in Europe and North America (mostly UK and USA). Digital interventions varied across format (e.g. web based, virtual reality based) and content type (e.g. biofeedback training). The most frequently used format for digital interventions were smartphone apps with the most common digital intervention type being general stress management programmes. Thirty-three studies indicated significant changes in at least one wellbeing measure, such as depression, anxiety, stress, resilience or compassion. On the EPHPP, 4 studies were rated strong, 14 were rated as moderate and 17 were rated as weak. Evidence suggests that digital interventions are a feasible, acceptable and effective approach to support wellbeing in healthcare professionals, although there are significant methodological limitations. Further research would benefit from stronger methodological designs, maximising participant engagement, and greater, more diverse sample sizes. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 282
页数:32
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Abbasalizadeh M., Farsi Z., Sajadi S.A., Atashi A., Fournier A., The effect of resilience training with mHealth application based on micro-learning method on the stress and anxiety of nurses working in intensive care units: A randomized controlled trial, BMC Medical Education, 24, 1, (2024)
[2]  
Adhyaru J.S., Kemp C., Virtual reality as a tool to promote wellbeing in the workplace, Digital Health, 8, (2022)
[3]  
Alkhaldi G., Hamilton F.L., Lau R., Webster R., Michie S., Murray E., The effectiveness of technology-based strategies to promote engagement with digital interventions: A systematic review protocol, JMIR Research Protocols, 4, 2, (2015)
[4]  
Anmella G., Sanabra M., Prime-Tous M., Segu X., Cavero M., Morilla I., Hidalgo-Mazzei D., Vickybot, a chatbot for anxiety-depressive symptoms and work-related burnout in primary care and health care professionals: Development, feasibility, and potential effectiveness studies, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, (2023)
[5]  
Armaou M., Araviaki E., Dutta S., Konstantinidis S., Blake H., Effectiveness of digital interventions for deficit-oriented and asset-oriented psychological outcomes in the workplace: A systematic review and narrative synthesis, European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12, 10, pp. 1471-1497, (2022)
[6]  
Armijo-Olivo S., Stiles C.R., Hagen N.A., Biondo P.D., Cummings G.G., Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: Methodological research, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 1, pp. 12-18, (2012)
[7]  
Babbage C.M., Jackson G.M., Davies E.B., Nixon E., Self-help digital interventions targeted at improving psychological well-being in young people with perceived or clinically diagnosed reduced well-being: Systematic review, JMIR Mental Health, 9, 8, (2022)
[8]  
Baek Y., Han K., Kim J., Yoo H.Y., Smartphone-based home workout program for shift-work nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic, Nursing & Health Sciences, 24, 3, pp. 708-716, (2022)
[9]  
Balasubramanian A., Paleri V., Bennett R., Paleri V., Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of surgeons and coping strategies, Head & Neck, 42, 7, pp. 1638-1644, (2020)
[10]  
Bangor A., Kortum P.T., Miller J.T., An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale, Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 6, pp. 574-594, (2008)