Sensitivity of associative priming to semantic relations: Insights from behavior and event-related potentials

被引:0
|
作者
Nie, Aiqing [1 ]
Wu, Yuanying [2 ]
Zheng, Xia [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Normal Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, 339 Taiyu Rd, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Psychol & Behav Sci, Hangzhou 310028, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Art & Archaeol, Hangzhou 310063, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Associative priming; Semantic relation; Thematic relation; Taxonomic relation; N300; N400; LPC; RECOGNITION PROCESSES; MEMORY; REPETITION; N400; WORD; COMPONENT; UNITIZATION; OBJECTS; N250R;
D O I
10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108056
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The priming effects have raised significant concerns. Previous research has solely focused on the priming of individual items, where both the prime and the target are single items. This study innovatively examines the priming effect for pairs and also considers the pair type for the target. In this experiment, the semantic relations of the prime and target pairs were categorized into thematic, taxonomic, and unrelated cases. The prime pairs were considered new, while the target pairs consisted of intact, rearranged, and "old + new" pairs. Behaviorally, we found that the priming effects were more pronounced when considering thematic relations compared to taxonomic relations. This indicates a stronger unitization between the items in taxonomic relations. Neurally, the N300 and N400 amplitudes were significantly larger for thematic relations compared to taxonomic relations. These results suggest that both object identification and semantic processing were more influenced by the semantic relation within the pairs. Moreover, we observed that the pair type exhibited distinct patterns in the ERP priming effect across different semantic relations. This indicates that semantic priming and repetition priming of associative pairs result in different effects.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Event-related potentials in pragmatic priming
    Rees, Alice
    Bott, Lewis
    Schumacher, Petra B.
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 712
  • [2] Syntactic priming in comprehension - Evidence from event-related potentials
    Ledoux, Kerry
    Traxler, Matthew J.
    Swaab, Tamara Y.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (02) : 135 - 143
  • [3] PICTURE PRIMING AND EARLY EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
    Henderson, Robert R.
    Bradley, Margaret M.
    Lang, Peter J.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 : S58 - S58
  • [4] Event-related brain potentials of masked repetition and semantic priming while listening to sentences
    Schumacher, Petra B.
    Bambini, Valentina
    Weiland, Hanna
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2012, 530 (02) : 138 - 143
  • [5] Sensitivity of event-related brain potentials to task rules
    Nasr, S.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (06) : 1343 - 1354
  • [6] EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS TO FACES - THE EFFECTS OF PRIMING AND RECOGNITION
    HERTZ, S
    PORJESZ, B
    BEGLEITER, H
    CHORLIAN, D
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 92 (04): : 342 - 351
  • [7] Semantic relationship shared between words: influence on associative recognition supported by event-related potentials
    Lyu, Yuan
    Wang, Yujuan
    Mao, Xinrui
    Li, Xian
    Guo, Chunyan
    NEUROREPORT, 2018, 29 (02) : 71 - 78
  • [8] Unitization congruence moderates the effect of unitization on associative recognition: evidence from event-related potentials
    Ma, Yurao
    Liu, Zejun
    Zhao, Chunyu
    Guo, Chunyan
    NEUROREPORT, 2021, 32 (17) : 1357 - 1363
  • [9] Event-related potentials in an associative word pair learning paradigm
    Farshad, Maryam
    Pavlov, Yuri G.
    Kotchoubey, Boris
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2021, 59
  • [10] Event-related potentials to event-related words: Grammatical class and semantic attributes in the representation of knowledge
    Barber, Horacio A.
    Kousta, Stavroula-Thaleia
    Otten, Leun J.
    Vigliocco, Gabriella
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1332 : 65 - 74