Does drought management care for nature? Identifying gaps in the consideration of freshwater ecosystems

被引:0
作者
Ramos-Sanchez, Celia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
De Stefano, Lucia [2 ]
Werner, Micha [4 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Water Management Dept, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Geol, Madrid, Spain
[3] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Hydroinformat & Sociotech Innovat Dept, Delft, Netherlands
[4] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Water Resources & Ecol Dept, Delft, Netherlands
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2025年 / 20卷 / 05期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
drought risk management; sustainability; freshwater ecosystems; ecological drought; ecological risk assessment; ECOLOGICAL DROUGHT; AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FLOW; IMPACTS; VULNERABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/adc1e4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Growing evidence suggests that freshwater ecosystems incur exacerbated impacts during drought due to anthropogenic activities. This has prompted calls for the development of drought management strategies that more effectively incorporate these ecosystems. Efforts to examine how drought management instruments care for freshwater ecosystems are scarce, limited to a few geographic regions, and do not systematically analyse each of the elements of the drought management process. In this study, we review drought management instruments in 26 countries or regions within countries to assess the extent and the manner with which freshwater ecosystems are considered. We apply an analytical framework integrating knowledge from drought management, ecological risk assessment and ecological drought to extract data from these instruments and identify patterns and gaps. Results indicate that care for freshwater ecosystems in drought management is as yet at an early stage. This is reflected in the limited inclusion of freshwater ecosystems across critical elements of the drought management process, as well as significant shortcomings in how these ecosystems are considered. We synthesise these shortcomings in four gaps. First, the socio-ecological perspective of ecological drought, particularly regarding the combined natural-human causes of drought impacts on freshwater ecosystems, is often lacking in drought definitions, exposure and vulnerability assessments. Second, despite their importance to ecosystems, there is limited consideration of variables related to groundwater, water quality, and aquatic habitats in freshwater ecosystem indicators, exposure assessments and measures. Third, the duration, frequency and timing of drought, which are relevant to the ecology of freshwater ecosystems, are rarely considered in drought indicators and measures. Finally, exposure and vulnerability assessments often lack a comprehensive understanding of ecological drought risk in freshwater ecosystems. We discuss these gaps and provide an outlook towards more integrated and sustainable drought policy and management.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Water and climate: Recognize anthropogenic drought
    AghaKouchak, Amir
    Feldman, David
    Hoerling, Martin
    Huxman, Travis
    Lund, Jay
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 524 (7566) : 409 - 411
  • [2] Alamos N., 2023, The Influence of Human Activities on Streamflow Reductions during the Megadrought in Central Chile, DOI [10.5194/hess-2023-246, DOI 10.5194/HESS-2023-246]
  • [3] Alkadir M A., 2022, A Multi-criteria Assessment Framework for National Drought Planning, DOI [10.4060/cc1276en, DOI 10.4060/CC1276EN]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1999, Environmental indicators: Typology and overview
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, LIVING PLANET REPORT
  • [6] Drought indicators revisited: the need for a wider consideration of environment and society
    Bachmair, Sophie
    Stahl, Kerstin
    Collins, Kevin
    Hannaford, Jamie
    Acreman, Mike
    Svoboda, Mark
    Knutson, Cody
    Smith, Kelly Helm
    Wall, Nicole
    Fuchs, Brian
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Overton, Ian C.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2016, 3 (04): : 516 - 536
  • [7] Disentangling the complexity of human-nature interactions
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Reyers, Belinda
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (02) : 402 - 409
  • [8] 'Societal Relationships with Nature': A framework for understanding nature-related conflicts and multiple values
    Berghoefer, Uta
    Rode, Julian
    Jax, Kurt
    Foerster, Johannes
    Berghoefer, Augustin
    Wittmer, Heidi
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2022, 4 (02) : 534 - 548
  • [9] Blaikie P., 1994, At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
  • [10] Resistance and resilience of invertebrate communities to seasonal and supraseasonal drought in arid-land headwater streams
    Bogan, Michael T.
    Boersma, Kate S.
    Lytle, David A.
    [J]. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (12) : 2547 - 2558