Iterative machine learning control of the hollow cathode plume mode using Gaussian Process Regression

被引:0
作者
Brooks, John W. [1 ]
Greve, Christine M. [2 ]
Georgin, Marcel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC
[2] Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards AFB, Boron, 93516, CA
来源
Journal of Electric Propulsion | 2025年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
Chaos control; Gaussian Process Regression; Hollow cathode; Iterative learning control; Plume mode instability;
D O I
10.1007/s44205-025-00137-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mitigating the sudden onset of deleterious and oscillatory dynamics (often called instabilities or modes) is an open problem in many plasma sources, including hollow cathodes (HC). These dynamics are difficult to address because they are nonlinear, chaotic, and often too fast for traditional active-control systems. In this work, we present an alternative control architecture called Iterative Machine Learning Control (IMLC), where the controller operates slower than the high-speed dynamics. The controller “fingerprints” the dynamics using a nonlinear data representation called Time-Lagged Phase Portrait (TLPP) and then uses Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to iteratively adjust the HC’s input (control) parameters until the reference dynamics are reproduced (or avoided). We perform three tests to highlight the abilities and limitations of this architecture. First, we identify four control parameters and demonstrate each parameter’s ability to control the plume mode: plasma discharge current, cathode mass flow, chamber backfill mass flow, and an axially-aligned electromagnet. Second, we demonstrate that the controller can control multiple parameters simultaneously and either reproduce or avoid oscillatory dynamics. Finally, we demonstrate that the controller can reproduce known dynamics in the presence of uncontrolled, drifting background pressure. This work underscores the interdisciplinary nature of merging plasma dynamics with machine learning-based control to achieve robust, adaptive tuning. By framing the controller in a data-driven IMLC framework, we address the difficulties posed by high-frequency instabilities that standard real-time controllers often cannot manage directly. © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2025.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 55 条
[11]  
Pinero L.R., The Impact of Harness Impedance on Hall Thruster Discharge Oscillations, International Electric Propulsion Conference, (2017)
[12]  
Byers D., Dankanich J.W., A review of facility effects on hall effect thrusters, 31st International Electric Propulsion Conference, (2009)
[13]  
Kamhawi H., Mackey J., Frieman J.D., Huang W., Gray T., Haag T., Mikellides I., HERMeS thruster magnetic field topology optimization study: performance, stability, and wear results, 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference, (2019)
[14]  
Bristow D., Tharayil M., Alleyne A., A survey of iterative learning control, IEEE Control Syst Mag, 26, 3, pp. 96-114, (2006)
[15]  
Ji X., Longman R.W., On iterative learing control of time varying systems, In: 2018 Space Flight Mechanics Meeting.
[16]  
Zhang Y., Chu B., Shu Z., A preliminary study on the relationship between iterative learning control and reinforcement learning, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52, 29, pp. 314-319, (2019)
[17]  
Vemula A., Sun W., Likhachev M., Bagnell J.A., On the effectiveness of iterative learning control, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, (2022)
[18]  
Norrlof M., An adaptive iterative learning control algorithm with experiments on an industrial robot, IEEE Trans Robot Autom, 18, 2, pp. 245-251, (2002)
[19]  
Xu X., Gao Y., Zhang W., Iterative learning control of a nonlinear aeroelastic system despite gust load, Int J Aerosp Eng, 2015, (2015)
[20]  
Ravensbergen T., de Vries P.C., Felici F., Blanken T.C., Nouailletas R., Zabeo L., Density control in ITER: an iterative learning control and robust control approach, Nucl Fusion, 58, 1, (2017)