DAO as digital governance tool for collaborative housing

被引:0
作者
Lustenberger, Michael [1 ]
Wollenschlager, Sabrina [1 ]
Kung, Lukas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ZHAW Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Inst Org Viabil, Sch Management & Law, Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Nicosia, Inst Future, Sch Business, Nicosia, Cyprus
来源
FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN | 2025年 / 8卷
关键词
collaborative housing; decentralized autonomous organization; blockchain; governance; commons; common-pool resource; CONSTRUCTION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3389/fbloc.2025.1523951
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper explores the promise of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) as a digital governance tool for collaborative housing initiatives. Based on existing literature around the collaborative housing initiative no1s1, we explore the research question: How can DAOs help govern collaborative housing initiatives? To address this, we employ conceptual research methods, synthesizing theories from the field of collaborative housing and DAOs to propose a new framework for the governance of such initiatives. Our analysis identifies five key benefits of DAOs in collaborative housing governance: a transparent crypto-accounting system, scalable decision-making, global jurisdiction and rule enforcement, automated rights and incentives system, and flexible polycentric governance. These benefits align with Elinor Ostrom's "Governing the Commons" principles and highlight the potential of DAOs to enable scalability and autonomy in geographically dispersed communities. While theoretical, our study provides insights into the transformative potential of blockchain-based DAOs in collaborative housing governance, laying the groundwork for further research and real-world and empirical validation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] The Rhetoric of Mouvement and Passionate Expression in Seventeenth-Century French Harpsichord Music
    Martin, Margot
    [J]. SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH STUDIES, 2009, 31 (02): : 137 - 149
  • [2] Reproducing housing commons. Government involvement and differential commoning in a housing cooperative
    Aernouts, Nele
    Ryckewaert, Michael
    [J]. HOUSING STUDIES, 2019, 34 (01) : 92 - 110
  • [3] Axelsen H., 2022, Inf. Model. Q, V31, P51, DOI [10.7250/csimq.2022-31.04, DOI 10.7250/CSIMQ.2022-31.04]
  • [4] Why are housing cooperatives successful? Insights from Swiss affordable housing policy
    Balmer, Ivo
    Gerber, Jean-David
    [J]. HOUSING STUDIES, 2018, 33 (03) : 361 - 385
  • [5] Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda
    Beck, Roman
    Muller-Bloch, Christoph
    King, John Leslie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (10): : 1020 - 1034
  • [6] The rise of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs): a first empirical glimpse
    Bellavitis, Cristiano
    Fisch, Christian
    Momtaz, Paul P.
    [J]. VENTURE CAPITAL, 2023, 25 (02) : 187 - 203
  • [7] Proof-of-Personhood: Redemocratizing Permissionless Cryptocurrencies
    Borge, Maria
    Kokoris-Kogias, Eleftherios
    Jovanovic, Philipp
    Gasser, Linus
    Gailly, Nicolas
    Ford, Bryan
    [J]. 2017 2ND IEEE EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY WORKSHOPS (EUROS&PW), 2017, : 23 - 26
  • [8] Who Owns Collaborative Housing? A Conceptual Typology of Property Regimes
    Bossuyt, Daniel
    [J]. HOUSING THEORY & SOCIETY, 2022, 39 (02) : 200 - 216
  • [9] Brenton M., 2013, SENIOR COHOUSING COM
  • [10] Buterin V, 2014, NEXT GENERATION SMAR, V3, P2