Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in nursing education for nursing students and nursing staffs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Hsieh, Jing-Yi [1 ]
Lin, Pei-Chao [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sun, Wan-Na [5 ,6 ]
Lin, Tsai-Rung [7 ]
Kuo, Chia-Chi [8 ]
Hsu, Hsin-Tien [4 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Management, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Nursing, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Ctr Long Term Care Res, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan
[6] Chung Hwa Univ Med Technol, Coll Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Coll Nursing, Dept Nursing, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[8] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Nursing, Chiayi Campus, Chiayi, Taiwan
[9] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Immersive virtual reality; Nursing education; Knowledge; Skills; Problem-solving abilities; Motion sickness; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106725
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Aim: This study evaluates the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality (VR) in nursing education, with a focus on its impact on knowledge acquisition, skill development, and problem-solving abilities among nursing students and nursing staff. In addition, it examines the effects of different levels of VR immersion across various learner populations, as well as potential side effects. Background: Traditional nursing education often lacks realistic clinical settings, leading to "reality shock" during clinical practice. VR provides a safe environment for learners to simulate clinical scenarios and practice without fear of errors. However, the effects of varying levels of VR immersion remain unclear. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Review Methods: A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and Airiti Library was conducted for Chinese and English studies published up to October 22, 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools, while evidence quality was evaluated with GRADE. Metaanalyses used standardized mean differences (SMD) and a significance threshold of p < .05. Results: Twenty-four studies involving 1812 participants showed that VR significantly improved knowledge (small effect, SMD = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p = .02), skills (medium effect, SMD = 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.35-1.10, p = .0002), and problem-solving abilities (large effect, SMD = 1.46, 95 % CI: 0.65-2.28, p = .0004). Fully immersive VR was particularly effective in enhancing nursing students' knowledge (SMD = 0.41, 95 % CI: 0.11-0.70, p = .007), while semi-immersive VR was more effective for nursing staff (SMD = 1.34, 95 % CI: 0.85-1.84, p < .001). Six of the 24 studies examined side effects, with four reporting adverse reactions. The most common side effect was motion sickness, manifesting as nausea, vomiting, and cold sweats. Conclusions: Immersive VR is an effective tool for improving knowledge, skills, and problem-solving abilities in nursing education, with fully immersive VR benefiting students and semi-immersive VR benefiting staff. Despite its advantages, potential side effects like motion sickness should be considered. VR presents a promising, realistic, and repeatable approach to nursing education.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experiences of immersive virtual reality in healthcare clinical training for nursing and allied health students: A mixed studies systematic review☆
    Quah, Tze Ching Shyanne
    Lau, Ying
    Ang, Wen Wei
    Lau, Siew Tiang
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2025, 148
  • [32] The effects of maternal-child nursing clinical practicum using virtual reality on nursing students' competencies: a systematic review
    Hwang, Sungwoo
    Kim, Hyun Kyoung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF WOMEN HEALTH NURSING, 2022, 28 (03): : 174 - 186
  • [33] Effectiveness of using high-fidelity simulation on learning outcomes in undergraduate nursing education: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tonapa, S. I.
    Mulyadi, M.
    Ho, K. H. M.
    Efendi, F.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (02) : 444 - 458
  • [34] Approaches for boosting self-confidence of clinical nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tabriz, Elahe Ramezanzade
    Sadeghi, Masoumeh
    Tavana, Ensieh
    Miri, Hamid Heidarian
    Nabavi, Fatemeh Heshmati
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [35] Prevalence of depression among nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tung, Yi-Jung
    Lo, Kenneth K. H.
    Ho, Roger C. M.
    Tam, Wai San Wilson
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 63 : 119 - 129
  • [36] Virtual reality simulation for nursing education: effectiveness and feasibility
    Kiegaldie, Debra
    Shaw, Louise
    BMC NURSING, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [37] Launching immersive virtual reality in a prelicensure nursing program
    Madiraca, Jessica
    Schell, Kathleen
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2025, 102
  • [38] The effectiveness of concept mapping on development of critical thinking in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yue, Meng
    Zhang, Meng
    Zhang, Chunmei
    Jin, Changde
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 52 : 87 - 94
  • [39] Outcomes of scenario-based simulation courses in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Saragih, Ita Daryanti
    Tarihoran, Dame Elysabeth Tuty Arna Uly
    Lin, Wei-Ting
    Lee, Bih-O
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 136
  • [40] Comparative Effectiveness of Mental Health Simulation Techniques in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Hai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2025, 34 (01)