Assessing the impact of regulatory reforms on the market value of retail banks in the United Kingdom (UK), an event study methodology

被引:0
作者
Amuah, Donald [1 ]
Amadi, Chibuzo [1 ,2 ]
Ode-Ichakpa, Inalegwu [3 ]
Ituma, Afam [1 ]
Okolie, Cynthia Nzubechukwu [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Wales, Accounting & Finance Dept, Pontypridd, Wales
[2] Coal City Univ CCU, Management Sci Dept, Enugu, Nigeria
[3] East Stroudsburg Univ, Business Management Dept, East Stroudsburg, PA USA
[4] Alex Ekwueme Fed Univ, Dept Accountancy, Ndufu Alike, Ikwo, Nigeria
关键词
Bank regulation; retail banks; stock market value; stock returns; Banking Reform Act (2013); Financial Services and Markets Act (2023); event study; Finance; Business; Management and Accounting; Economics; DAILY STOCK RETURNS; RISK; DIVERSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; HYPOTHESIS; EFFICIENCY; BEHAVIOR; WEALTH; STATA; TESTS;
D O I
10.1080/23322039.2025.2484652
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of two significant regulatory reforms, the Banking Reform Act (2013) and the Financial Services and Markets Act (2023), on the market value of the four largest retail banks in the UK. The research employs an event study methodology, a well-established approach in financial economics, to analyse the stock market reactions to key legislative events associated with the enactment of both acts. The study focuses on three critical stages in the legislative process: the third reading in the House of Commons, the third reading in the House of Lords and the Royal Assent. Daily stock price data from 2000 to 2023 is used to calculate abnormal returns, which are then analysed for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The findings reveal that the Banking Reform Act 2013, while not significantly impacting individual bank returns, had a collective negative effect on the stock prices of the four banks. This suggests that the market perceived the reforms as potentially reducing bank profitability due to increased regulatory burdens and structural changes. Conversely, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023, enacted a decade later, showed a positive and significant effect on the collective stock returns of the banks.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Interaction between investor sentiment, limits to arbitrage and the returns of stock market anomalies: evidence from the UK stock market [J].
Alburaythin, Y. ;
Fifield, S. G. M. ;
Paramati, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2025, 31 (01) :76-98
[2]   Basel III: Is the cure worse than the disease? [J].
Allen, Bill ;
Chan, Ka Kei ;
Milne, Alistair ;
Thomas, Steve .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 25 :159-166
[3]   Does Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector Predict Future Economic Downturns? [J].
Allen, Linda ;
Bali, Turan G. ;
Tang, Yi .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (10) :3000-3036
[4]   THE WEALTH EFFECTS OF DEREGULATION OF CANADIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS [J].
AMOAKOADU, B ;
SMITH, BF .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1995, 19 (07) :1211-1236
[5]   Wealth and risk implications of the Dodd-Frank Act on the US financial intermediaries [J].
Andriosopoulos, Kostas ;
Chan, Ka Kei ;
Dontis-Charitos, Panagiotis ;
Staikouras, Sotiris K. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2017, 33 :366-379
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Econometrics of Financial Markets, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400830213-004
[7]  
Arcuri M C, 2020, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, V13, P1
[8]   Does the stock market value bank diversification? [J].
Baele, Lieven ;
De Jonghe, Olivier ;
Vennet, Rudi Vander .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2007, 31 (07) :1999-2023
[9]   Assessing the introduction of anti-money laundering regulations on bank stock valuation An empirical analysis [J].
Balani, Henry .
JOURNAL OF MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL, 2019, 22 (01) :76-88